Michigan Tech — Bowling Green Falcons 3:2: match report and statistics

NCAA · 08.03.2026 21:07 · Finished

Compare teams
Michigan Tech
Finished3 : 208.03.2026 21:07
Bowling Green Falcons

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Michigan Tech0%
  • Draw0%
  • Bowling Green Falcons0%

Overview

The NCAA match Michigan Tech – Bowling Green Falcons on 08.03.2026 21:07 (UTC) finished 3:2. Michigan Tech took the victory.

Form of Michigan Tech in the last 6 matches: wins 2, draws 3, defeats 1. Form of Bowling Green Falcons in the last 6 matches: wins 3, draws 1, defeats 2.

Head-to-head meetings: 11. Wins of Michigan Tech: 1, wins of Bowling Green Falcons: 5, draws: 0. The last meeting on 28.02.2026 00:07 ended Michigan Tech 0:1 Bowling Green Falcons.

Related pages: Michigan Tech statistics, Bowling Green Falcons statistics, NCAA standings and results.

Other games: Ice hockey matches today. Data on this page is provided by SportAPI Ice hockey data API.

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Michigan Tech
1113
Bowling Green Falcons
0022

Head-to-head

Matches played: 11
draws: 0

1 / 11
Wins
5 / 11
6 / 20
Points
14 / 20
Matches

Previous matches: Michigan Tech

Previous matches: Bowling Green Falcons

Match info

Tournament
NCAA
Season
2025/2026

Upcoming matches: Michigan Tech

Upcoming matches: Bowling Green Falcons

Match forecast

Quick readEven matchOver 2.5 88%Both teams to score 85%Goal peak P2
46%Win · Michigan Tech2.17
18%Draw5.55
36%Win · Bowling Green Falcons2.79
5.1Expected goals
  • The model expects 5.1 goals: 2.7 for Michigan Tech and 2.4 for Bowling Green Falcons.
  • Most likely score is 2–2 (6%), followed by 3–2 (6%).
  • Most goals in both teams' matches come in P2: 21 in total.
  • Expected goals by half: 1st — 1.5, 2nd — 2.1.

Correct score by the model

2–26.4%3–25.8%2–15.3%2–35.1%3–14.8%1–24.7%3–34.6%1–14%4–23.9%

Scores 4+ goals: Michigan Tech — 29%, Bowling Green Falcons — 22%

MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Over 0.5——99%1.01
Over 1.5——96%1.04
Over 2.5——88%1.13
Over 3.580%60%75%1.34
Over 4.580%60%58%1.73

Poisson model on recent matches: home team at home (5), away team away (5). History — share of each team's matches where the line came in.

Trends

  • Scored in 9 matches in a row100%
  • Over 4.5 goals in 7 of 8 matches88%
  • Both teams scored in 7 of 8 matches88%
  • Under 7.5 goals in 7 of 9 matches78%
  • Scored under 3.5 in 7 of 9 matches78%
  • Both teams scored in 7 of 9 matches78%
  • Scored over 2.5 in 6 of 8 matches75%
  • Conceded over 2.5 in 6 of 8 matches75%

Based on recent matches: home team — 8, away team — 9

Markets by recent matches

Michigan Techmatches: 5 · 5Bowling Green Falcons
5.6Avg match total4.6
80%4/5Over 3.560%3/5
20%1/5Under 3.540%2/5
80%4/5Over 4.560%3/5
20%1/5Under 4.540%2/5
60%3/5Over 5.560%3/5
40%2/5Under 5.540%2/5
60%3/5Over 6.540%2/5
40%2/5Under 6.560%3/5
20%1/5Over 7.520%1/5
80%4/5Under 7.580%4/5

Share of each team's recent matches where the match total went over / under the line.

First goal and after

First to score…

Michigan TechBowling Green Falcons
—Scores first—
—…and wins—
—…and draws—
—…and loses—
—…and then concedes—

First to concede…

—Concedes first—
—…and then scores—
—…and comes back to win—
—…and saves a draw—

Overall

40%2/5Scores in both halves40%2/5
80%4/5Scores at all100%5/5

Scoring by period

matches: 5 · 5
Michigan TechBowling Green Falcons
ForAg.%Period%ForAg.
4580%Period 180%33
65100%Period 280%46
4280%Period 360%33
11100%Period 4100%10
  • • Michigan Tech scores most in Period 2: 6 of 15 goals (40%).
  • • Michigan Tech concedes most in Period 1: 5 of 13 conceded.
  • • Bowling Green Falcons scores most in Period 2: 4 of 11 goals (36%).
  • • Bowling Green Falcons concedes most in Period 2: 6 of 12 conceded.
  • Framed — the period where the team scores / concedes the most. % — share of matches with an event in the period.

Markets in head-to-head

83%Over 1.55 of 6
83%Over 2.55 of 6
50%Over 3.53 of 6
33%Both teams to score2 of 6
17%Michigan Tech wins1 of 6
83%Bowling Green Falcons wins5 of 6
0%Draw0 of 6

Head-to-head matches: 6 · 3.33 goals per match on average.