Valentin Vacherot — Jaime Faria 2:1: match report and statistics

Davis Cup. Group 1 · 01.02.2025 10:30 · Finished

Head-to-head: Valentin Vacherot vs Jaime Faria
Valentin VacherotATP: 31
Finished2 : 101.02.2025 10:30
Jaime FariaATP: 57

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Valentin Vacherot0%
  • Draw0%
  • Jaime Faria0%

Overview

Final score Valentin Vacherot 2:1 Jaime Faria, Davis Cup. Group 1, 01.02.2025 10:30 (UTC). The win went to Valentin Vacherot.

Form of Valentin Vacherot in the last 6 matches: wins 3, defeats 3. Form of Jaime Faria in the last 6 matches: wins 4, defeats 2.

Head-to-head meetings: 1. Wins of Valentin Vacherot: 1, wins of Jaime Faria: 0. The last meeting on 03.05.2023 08:10 ended Jaime Faria 0:2 Valentin Vacherot.

Statistics and results: Valentin Vacherot statistics, Jaime Faria statistics, Davis Cup. Group 1 standings and results.

See also Tennis matches today.

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Valentin Vacherot
6662
Jaime Faria
4721

Match statistics

  • 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3

Game by game

Valentin Vacherot
Jaime Faria
4/4Service games won2/42Breaks02/6Break points converted0
  • 1 : 0Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP40:30 BP
  • 2 : 0
    15:0 30:0 40:0
  • 2 : 1
    15:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 BP40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
  • 3 : 1
    15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 A:40
  • 3 : 2
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40
  • 4 : 2
    15:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 40:30
  • 5 : 2Lost serve
    0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP
  • 6 : 2
    15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 1
draws: 0

1 / 1
Wins
0 / 1
2 / 2
Points
0 / 2
Matches

Previous matches: Valentin Vacherot

Previous matches: Jaime Faria

Match info

Season
2025

Match forecast and markets

Quick readValentin Vacherot favourite · 57%Likely score 2:0Expected games 25.3Tiebreak in match 43%
57%Win · Valentin Vacherot1.77
43%Win · Jaime Faria2.31
25.3Expected games
54%Valentin Vacherot wins 1st set1.84
43%Tiebreak in match2.34
50%Deciding set2.02
  • On serve the model gives Valentin Vacherot 63% of points and Jaime Faria 62% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (30%), then 2:1 (27%).
  • About 25.3 games expected; over 21.5 — 67%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Valentin Vacherot wins50%3/633%2/657%1.77
Jaime Faria wins50%3/667%4/643%2.31
Valentin Vacherot wins 1st set50%3/633%2/654%1.84
Deciding set33%2/617%1/650%2.02
Tiebreak in match33%2/617%1/643%2.34
Score in sets
2:050%3/617%1/630%3.38
2:10%0/60%0/627%3.70
1:233%2/617%1/623%4.42
0:217%1/633%2/621%4.82

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Valentin Vacherotmatches: 6

Strengths

  • Double faults per match 2 (avg 3.2)Strong
  • First serve in 70% (avg 65%)Strong
  • Points won on 2nd serve 52% (avg 49%)Strong
  • Closing out after winning 1st set 3/3Strong

Weaknesses

  • Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
Aces per match
7.2
Double faults per match
2
First serve in
70%
Service games held
79%
Return games won
27%

Jaime Fariamatches: 6

Strengths

  • Aces per match 8.7 (avg 6.9)Strong
  • Points won on 1st serve 74% (avg 70%)Strong
  • Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong

Weaknesses

  • Double faults per match 5.2 (avg 3.2)Very weak
  • First serve in 59% (avg 65%)Very weak
Aces per match
8.7
Double faults per match
5.2
First serve in
59%
Service games held
80%
Return games won
24%

What to expect

  • Jaime Faria will hit many aces — 8.7 per match on averageLikely
  • Jaime Faria makes many double faults — 5.2 per matchVery likely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • Over 18.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 5 of 683%

Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 6

Win probability

Points won on serve: 67% Points won on serve: 61%Before the match: 77%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.