Darderi/Navone — Hidalgo/Tabilo 2:1: match report and statistics

ATP. Buenos Aires. Doubles · 12.02.2025 21:35 · Finished

Head-to-head: Darderi/Navone vs Hidalgo/Tabilo
ClayJulian Paz Almeida (Argentina)
Darderi/Navone
Finished2 : 112.02.2025 21:35
Hidalgo/Tabilo

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Darderi/Navone0%
  • Draw0%
  • Hidalgo/Tabilo0%

Overview

The ATP. Buenos Aires. Doubles match Darderi/Navone – Hidalgo/Tabilo on 12.02.2025 21:35 (UTC) finished 2:1. The win went to Darderi/Navone.

Form of Darderi/Navone in the last 3 matches: wins 1, defeats 2. Form of Hidalgo/Tabilo in the last 6 matches: wins 3, defeats 3.

Related pages: Darderi/Navone, Hidalgo/Tabilo, ATP. Buenos Aires. Doubles.

See also Tennis matches today.

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Darderi/Navone
67102
Hidalgo/Tabilo
7631

Match statistics

  • 4 Aces 2
  • 0 Double faults 1
  • 69% First serve 62%
  • 84% (46/55)1st serve points won(40/52) 77%
  • 64% (16/25)2nd serve points won(18/32) 56%
  • 0% Break points saved 0%
  • 23% (12/52)1st serve return points won(9/55) 16%
  • 44% (14/32)2nd serve return points won(9/25) 36%
  • 0% Break points converted 0%
  • 78% (62/80)Service points won(58/84) 69%
  • 31% (26/84)Return points won(18/80) 23%
  • 54% (88/164)Total points won(76/164) 46%
  • 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
  • 3 Match Points Saved 0
  • 100% (12/12)Service games won(12/12) 100%
  • 0% (0/12)Return games won(0/12) 0%
  • 50% (12/24)Total games won(12/24) 50%

Game by game

Darderi/Navone
Hidalgo/Tabilo
7/7Service games won3/63Breaks00Break points converted0
  • 1 : 0
  • 2 : 0Lost serve
  • 3 : 0Lost serve
  • 4 : 0
  • 5 : 0
  • 5 : 1
  • 5 : 2
  • 6 : 2
  • 7 : 2
  • 8 : 2Lost serve
  • 8 : 3
  • 9 : 3
  • 10 : 3

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

The teams have not met yet

Previous matches: Darderi/Navone

Previous matches: Hidalgo/Tabilo

Match info

Tournament
Buenos Aires
Referee
Julian Paz Almeida

ATP. Buenos Aires. Doubles

Match forecast and markets

Quick readHidalgo/Tabilo favourite · 75%Likely score 0:2Expected games 26.1Tiebreak in match 61%
25%Win · Darderi/Navone4.03
75%Win · Hidalgo/Tabilo1.33
26.1Expected games
33%Darderi/Navone wins 1st set3.08
61%Tiebreak in match1.63
44%Deciding set2.28
  • On serve the model gives Darderi/Navone 66% of points and Hidalgo/Tabilo 72% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (46%), then 1:2 (30%).
  • About 26.1 games expected; over 21.5 — 73%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Darderi/Navone wins33%1/367%6/925%4.03
Hidalgo/Tabilo wins67%2/333%3/975%1.33
Darderi/Navone wins 1st set33%1/356%5/933%3.08
Deciding set0%0/344%4/944%2.28
Tiebreak in match0%0/344%4/961%1.63
Score in sets
0:267%2/322%2/946%2.19
1:20%0/311%1/930%3.38
2:10%0/333%3/914%7.01
2:033%1/333%3/911%9.47

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (3 and 9) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Darderi/Navonematches: 3

No notable deviations from the sample average.

Aces per match
1.3
Double faults per match
2.7
First serve in
67%
Service games held
74%
Return games won
11%

Hidalgo/Tabilomatches: 9

Strengths

  • Tiebreaks 4/6Strong

Weaknesses

  • Points won on 2nd serve 53% (avg 56%)Weak
  • Return games won 7% (avg 12%)Weak
  • Deciding sets 1/4Weak
  • Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/5Weak
Aces per match
4.4
Double faults per match
3.3
First serve in
67%
Service games held
85%
Return games won
7%

What to expect

  • Both hold serve confidently — a tiebreak is possible (61% by the model)Very likely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • 3 defeats in a row100%
  • Over 19.5 games in 7 of 9 matches78%

Based on recent matches: home team — 3, away team — 9

Win probability

Points won on serve: 70% Points won on serve: 67%Before the match: 62%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.