Talia Gibson — Aliaksandra Sasnovich 0:2: match report and statistics
WTA. Paris · 11.05.2026 14:15 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Talia Gibson0%
- Draw0%
- Aliaksandra Sasnovich0%
Overview
Talia Gibson vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich ended 0:2 on 11.05.2026 14:15 (UTC) in WTA. Paris. The win went to Aliaksandra Sasnovich.
Talia Gibson, last 6 games: won 1, drawn 0, lost 5. Aliaksandra Sasnovich, last 6 games: won 2, drawn 0, lost 4.
Related pages: Talia Gibson results and fixtures, Aliaksandra Sasnovich results and fixtures, WTA. Paris standings and results.
More matches: Tennis results and fixtures. The statistics are powered by SportAPI.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match statistics
- 4 Aces 2
- 8 Double faults 5
- 58% First serve 56%
- 57% (17/30)1st serve points won(21/27) 78%
- 27% (6/22)2nd serve points won(11/21) 52%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 22% (6/27)1st serve return points won(13/30) 43%
- 52% (11/21)2nd serve return points won(16/22) 73%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 44% (23/52)Service points won(32/49) 65%
- 35% (17/49)Return points won(29/52) 56%
- 40% (40/101)Total points won(61/101) 60%
- 3 Посл. 10 мячей 7
- 1 Match Points Saved 0
- 38% (3/8)Service games won(7/8) 88%
- 13% (1/8)Return games won(5/8) 63%
- 25% (4/16)Total games won(12/16) 75%
Game by game
- Lost serve0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP
- 0 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- Lost serve0 : 30:15 0:30 0:40 BP
- 0 : 415:0 15:15 15:30 15:40
- Lost serve0 : 515:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP
- 0 : 60:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 MP30:40 MP
Head-to-head
Talia GibsonMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Aliaksandra SasnovichPrevious matches: Talia Gibson
Previous matches: Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Match info
- Tournament
- Paris
- Season
- 2026
Upcoming matches: Aliaksandra Sasnovich
WTA. Paris
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Talia Gibson 53% of points and Aliaksandra Sasnovich 59% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (46%), then 1:2 (30%).
- About 23.5 games expected; over 21.5 — 56%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talia Gibson wins | 17%1/6 | 67%4/6 | 25% | 4.06 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich wins | 83%5/6 | 33%2/6 | 75% | 1.33 |
| Talia Gibson wins 1st set | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 32% | 3.09 |
| Deciding set | 50%3/6 | 17%1/6 | 44% | 2.28 |
| Tiebreak in match | 33%2/6 | 0%0/6 | 28% | 3.55 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 50%3/6 | 33%2/6 | 46% | 2.19 |
| 1:2 | 33%2/6 | 0%0/6 | 30% | 3.38 |
| 2:1 | 17%1/6 | 17%1/6 | 14% | 7.06 |
| 2:0 | 0%0/6 | 50%3/6 | 10% | 9.55 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Talia Gibsonmatches: 6
Weaknesses
- Points won on 1st serve 57% (avg 63%)Very weak
- Service games held 52% (avg 63%)Very weak
- Return games won 25% (avg 37%)Very weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 1/3Very weak
- Aces per match 2.3 (avg 3.8)Weak
- Return points won 40% (avg 44%)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/3Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.3
- Double faults per match
- 3.7
- First serve in
- 66%
- Service games held
- 52%
- Return games won
- 25%
Aliaksandra Sasnovichmatches: 6
Weaknesses
- Points won on 2nd serve 39% (avg 43%)Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 2/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 3.5
- Double faults per match
- 3.7
- First serve in
- 67%
- Service games held
- 62%
- Return games won
- 36%
What to expect
- Aliaksandra Sasnovich will break Talia Gibson's serveLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
3 defeats in a row100%
Losses in 5 of 6 matches83%
Matches without a deciding set: 5 of 683%
Under 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 6
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.