Ann Li — Ekaterina Alexandrova 2:1: match report and statistics
WTA. Strasbourg · 19.05.2026 11:20 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Ann Li0%
- Draw0%
- Ekaterina Alexandrova0%
Overview
Final score Ann Li 2:1 Ekaterina Alexandrova, WTA. Strasbourg, 19.05.2026 11:20 (UTC). Ann Li took the victory.
Form of Ann Li in the last 5 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 2. Form of Ekaterina Alexandrova in the last 6 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 4.
Head-to-head meetings: 2. Wins of Ann Li: 0, wins of Ekaterina Alexandrova: 2, draws: 0. The last meeting on 08.10.2025 03:10 ended Ekaterina Alexandrova 2:0 Ann Li.
More on the site: Ann Li, Ekaterina Alexandrova, WTA. Strasbourg.
See also all Tennis matches of the day. Want the same statistics on your site? Try an embeddable sports statistics widget.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 10 Aces 3
- 1 Double faults 8
- 62% First serve 62%
- 78% (40/51)1st serve points won(41/60) 68%
- 48% (15/31)2nd serve points won(16/37) 43%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 32% (19/60)1st serve return points won(16/51) 31%
- 57% (21/37)2nd serve return points won(16/31) 52%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 65% (55/84)Service points won(57/97) 59%
- 41% (40/97)Return points won(29/84) 35%
- 52% (95/181)Total points won(86/181) 48%
- 5 Посл. 10 мячей 5
- 0 Match Points Saved 1
- 79% (11/14)Service games won(10/15) 67%
- 33% (5/15)Return games won(3/14) 21%
- 55% (16/29)Total games won(13/29) 45%
Game by game
- 0 : 10:15 0:30 0:40 15:40
- 1 : 115:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 1Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP40:30 BP
- 3 : 115:0 30:0 40:0
- 3 : 215:0 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 4 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30
- 5 : 2Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- Lost serve5 : 30:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30 MP40:40 40:A BP
- 6 : 3Lost serve0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30 MP
Head-to-head
Ann LiMatches played: 2
draws: 0
Ekaterina AlexandrovaPrevious matches: Ann Li
Previous matches: Ekaterina Alexandrova
Match info
- Tournament
- Strasbourg
- Season
- 2026
- Referee
- Lara Morgane
WTA. Strasbourg
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Ann Li 60% of points and Ekaterina Alexandrova 56% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (41%), then 2:1 (29%).
- About 24.1 games expected; over 21.5 — 60%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li wins | 60%3/5 | 67%4/6 | 70% | 1.42 |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova wins | 40%2/5 | 33%2/6 | 30% | 3.36 |
| Ann Li wins 1st set | 40%2/5 | 67%4/6 | 64% | 1.57 |
| Deciding set | 40%2/5 | 33%2/6 | 46% | 2.17 |
| Tiebreak in match | 20%1/5 | 33%2/6 | 32% | 3.11 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 20%1/5 | 33%2/6 | 41% | 2.45 |
| 2:1 | 40%2/5 | 33%2/6 | 29% | 3.39 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/5 | 0%0/6 | 17% | 5.99 |
| 0:2 | 40%2/5 | 33%2/6 | 13% | 7.65 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (5 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Ann Limatches: 5
Strengths
- Double faults per match 2.4 (avg 3.7)Strong
- Service games held 74% (avg 69%)Strong
- Aces per match
- 3
- Double faults per match
- 2.4
- First serve in
- 59%
- Service games held
- 74%
- Return games won
- 29%
Ekaterina Alexandrovamatches: 6
Strengths
- Aces per match 4.8 (avg 3.7)Strong
Weaknesses
- First serve in 54% (avg 60%)Very weak
- Double faults per match 4.7 (avg 3.7)Weak
- Points won on 2nd serve 43% (avg 47%)Weak
- Service games held 61% (avg 69%)Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 4.8
- Double faults per match
- 4.7
- First serve in
- 54%
- Service games held
- 61%
- Return games won
- 29%
What to expect
- Ekaterina Alexandrova will hit many aces — 4.8 per match on averageLikely
- Ekaterina Alexandrova makes many double faults — 4.7 per matchLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
No data yet
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.