Magda Linette — Kimberly Birrell 2:1: match report and statistics
WTA. 's-Hertogenbosch · 08.06.2026 09:10 · Finished
Head-to-head: Magda Linette vs Kimberly BirrellWho will win?
Votes: 0- Magda Linette0%
- Draw0%
- Kimberly Birrell0%
Overview
The WTA. 's-Hertogenbosch match Magda Linette – Kimberly Birrell on 08.06.2026 09:10 (UTC) finished 2:1. The win went to Magda Linette.
Form of Magda Linette in the last 6 matches: wins 3, defeats 3. Form of Kimberly Birrell in the last 6 matches: wins 1, defeats 5.
Related pages: Magda Linette, Kimberly Birrell, WTA. 's-Hertogenbosch table.
More matches: Tennis matches today.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 6 | 6 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 14 Aces 4
- 1 Double faults 5
- 60% First serve 76%
- 79% (30/38)1st serve points won(35/56) 63%
- 60% (15/25)2nd serve points won(6/18) 33%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 38% (21/56)1st serve return points won(9/38) 24%
- 67% (12/18)2nd serve return points won(10/25) 40%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 68% (45/66)Service points won(41/74) 55%
- 45% (33/74)Return points won(21/66) 32%
- 56% (78/140)Total points won(62/140) 44%
- 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 83% (10/12)Service games won(7/11) 64%
- 36% (4/11)Return games won(2/12) 17%
- 61% (14/23)Total games won(9/23) 39%
Game by game
- 0 : 10:15 0:30 0:40
- 1 : 115:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 1 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 2 : 215:0 30:0 40:0
- 3 : 2Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP40:30 BP40:40 A:40 BP
- 4 : 215:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 5 : 2Lost serve15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP
- 6 : 20:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP40:40 A:40 MP
Head-to-head
Magda LinetteMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Kimberly BirrellThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Magda Linette
Previous matches: Kimberly Birrell
Match info
- Tournament
- 's-Hertogenbosch
- Season
- 2026
WTA. 's-Hertogenbosch
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Magda Linette 56% of points and Kimberly Birrell 55% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (27%), then 2:1 (26%).
- About 24.4 games expected; over 21.5 — 63%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette wins | 50%3/6 | 83%5/6 | 53% | 1.89 |
| Kimberly Birrell wins | 50%3/6 | 17%1/6 | 47% | 2.12 |
| Magda Linette wins 1st set | 33%2/6 | 83%5/6 | 52% | 1.93 |
| Deciding set | 33%2/6 | 67%4/6 | 50% | 2.00 |
| Tiebreak in match | 17%1/6 | 33%2/6 | 31% | 3.26 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 17%1/6 | 33%2/6 | 27% | 3.71 |
| 2:1 | 33%2/6 | 50%3/6 | 26% | 3.86 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/6 | 17%1/6 | 24% | 4.16 |
| 0:2 | 50%3/6 | 0%0/6 | 23% | 4.32 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Magda Linettematches: 6
Strengths
- Double faults per match 1.7 (avg 3.7)Very strong
Weaknesses
- First serve in 56% (avg 60%)Weak
- Return points won 41% (avg 45%)Weak
- Return games won 30% (avg 39%)Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.8
- Double faults per match
- 1.7
- First serve in
- 56%
- Service games held
- 62%
- Return games won
- 30%
Kimberly Birrellmatches: 6
Strengths
- First serve in 65% (avg 60%)Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 1.2 (avg 2.8)Very weak
- Double faults per match 7 (avg 3.7)Very weak
- Points won on 2nd serve 36% (avg 44%)Very weak
- Points won on 1st serve 59% (avg 62%)Weak
- Service games held 54% (avg 61%)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 1.2
- Double faults per match
- 7
- First serve in
- 65%
- Service games held
- 54%
- Return games won
- 39%
What to expect
- Kimberly Birrell makes many double faults — 7 per matchVery likely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
Under 24.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Losses in 5 of 6 matches83%
Over 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 6
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.