Daniel Michalski — Gijs Brouwer 2:0: match report and statistics
Challenger. Plovdiv · 22.06.2026 14:35 · Finished
Head-to-head: Daniel Michalski vs Gijs BrouwerWho will win?
Votes: 0- Daniel Michalski0%
- Draw0%
- Gijs Brouwer0%
Overview
The Challenger. Plovdiv match Daniel Michalski – Gijs Brouwer on 22.06.2026 14:35 (UTC) finished 2:0. Daniel Michalski took the victory.
Daniel Michalski, last 6 games: won 2, lost 4. Gijs Brouwer, last 5 games: won 3, lost 2.
All meetings of Daniel Michalski and Gijs Brouwer: 1 (wins of Daniel Michalski: 0, wins of Gijs Brouwer: 1). The last meeting on 26.08.2020 08:00 ended Gijs Brouwer 2:0 Daniel Michalski.
Related pages: Daniel Michalski statistics, Gijs Brouwer statistics, Challenger. Plovdiv table.
Other games: Tennis results and fixtures.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
 Daniel Michalski | 6 | 6 | 2 |
 Gijs Brouwer | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 1 Aces 0
- 1 Double faults 10
- 56% First serve 47%
- 72% (13/18)1st serve points won(6/17) 35%
- 71% (10/14)2nd serve points won(1/19) 5%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 65% (11/17)1st serve return points won(5/18) 28%
- 95% (18/19)2nd serve return points won(4/14) 29%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 70% (21/30)Service points won(7/36) 19%
- 81% (29/36)Return points won(9/30) 30%
- 76% (50/66)Total points won(16/66) 24%
- 9 Посл. 10 мячей 1
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 71% (5/7)Service games won(0/7) 0%
- 100% (7/7)Return games won(2/7) 29%
- 86% (12/14)Total games won(2/14) 14%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 0Lost serve15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP
- 3 : 015:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 4 : 0Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- 5 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 6 : 0Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 MP
Head-to-head
Daniel MichalskiMatches played: 1
draws: 0
Gijs BrouwerPrevious matches: Daniel Michalski
Previous matches: Gijs Brouwer
Match info
- Tournament
- Plovdiv
- Season
- 2026
Upcoming matches: Daniel Michalski
Challenger. Plovdiv
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Daniel Michalski 59% of points and Gijs Brouwer 58% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (31%), then 2:1 (27%).
- About 24.6 games expected; over 21.5 — 64%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Michalski wins | 33%2/6 | 40%2/5 | 58% | 1.72 |
| Gijs Brouwer wins | 67%4/6 | 60%3/5 | 42% | 2.38 |
| Daniel Michalski wins 1st set | 33%2/6 | 20%1/5 | 55% | 1.81 |
| Deciding set | 50%3/6 | 40%2/5 | 49% | 2.02 |
| Tiebreak in match | 17%1/6 | 40%2/5 | 35% | 2.88 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 0%0/6 | 20%1/5 | 31% | 3.26 |
| 2:1 | 33%2/6 | 20%1/5 | 27% | 3.65 |
| 1:2 | 17%1/6 | 20%1/5 | 22% | 4.53 |
| 0:2 | 50%3/6 | 40%2/5 | 20% | 5.02 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 5) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Daniel Michalskimatches: 6
Strengths
- Double faults per match 2.3 (avg 3.7)Strong
- Deciding sets 2/3Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 2.5 (avg 3.5)Weak
- Points won on 2nd serve 43% (avg 46%)Weak
- Return points won 37% (avg 41%)Weak
- Return games won 23% (avg 30%)Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.5
- Double faults per match
- 2.3
- First serve in
- 66%
- Service games held
- 68%
- Return games won
- 23%
Gijs Brouwermatches: 5
Strengths
- First serve in 69% (avg 65%)Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 1.4 (avg 3.5)Very weak
- Double faults per match 5.4 (avg 3.7)Weak
- Aces per match
- 1.4
- Double faults per match
- 5.4
- First serve in
- 69%
- Service games held
- 55%
- Return games won
- 26%
What to expect
- Gijs Brouwer makes many double faults — 5.4 per matchLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- 3 defeats in a row100%
- Won the 1st set in 4 of 5 matches80%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 5
Win probability
Points won on serve: 66% Points won on serve: 42%Before the match: 100%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.