Chepelev — Denis Yevseyev 2:1: match report and statistics
Challenger. Braunschweig. Qualification · 06.07.2026 11:00 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Chepelev0%
- Draw0%
- Denis Yevseyev0%
Overview
Chepelev vs Denis Yevseyev ended 2:1 on 06.07.2026 11:00 (UTC) in Challenger. Braunschweig. Qualification. Chepelev took the victory.
Form of Chepelev in the last 6 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 3. Form of Denis Yevseyev in the last 6 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 3.
Related pages: Chepelev results and fixtures, Denis Yevseyev results and fixtures, Challenger. Braunschweig. Qualification table.
See also Tennis results and fixtures. Data on this page is provided by SportAPI Tennis data API.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Chepelev | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
 Denis Yevseyev | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 2 Aces 1
- 1 Double faults 1
- 74% First serve 82%
- 64% (36/56)1st serve points won(43/75) 57%
- 40% (8/20)2nd serve points won(2/17) 12%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 44% (33/75)1st serve return points won(20/56) 36%
- 88% (15/17)2nd serve return points won(12/20) 60%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 58% (44/76)Service points won(45/92) 49%
- 51% (47/92)Return points won(32/76) 42%
- 54% (91/168)Total points won(77/168) 46%
- 6 Посл. 10 мячей 4
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 69% (9/13)Service games won(6/12) 50%
- 50% (6/12)Return games won(4/13) 31%
- 60% (15/25)Total games won(10/25) 40%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 0Lost serve0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
- Lost serve2 : 10:15 0:30 0:40 BP
- 3 : 1Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- 4 : 10:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 40:40 A:40
- 4 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 5 : 215:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 5 : 315:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40 40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- 6 : 315:0 30:0 40:0 MP
Head-to-head
ChepelevMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Denis YevseyevThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Chepelev
Previous matches: Denis Yevseyev
Match info
- Tournament
- Braunschweig
- Season
- 2026
Upcoming matches: Chepelev
Challenger. Braunschweig. Qualification
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Chepelev 59% of points and Denis Yevseyev 54% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (46%), then 2:1 (30%).
- About 23.5 games expected; over 21.5 — 56%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chepelev wins | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 76% | 1.32 |
| Denis Yevseyev wins | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 24% | 4.16 |
| Chepelev wins 1st set | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 68% | 1.47 |
| Deciding set | 0%0/6 | 50%3/6 | 43% | 2.30 |
| Tiebreak in match | 0%0/6 | 33%2/6 | 29% | 3.49 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 50%3/6 | 17%1/6 | 46% | 2.16 |
| 2:1 | 0%0/6 | 33%2/6 | 30% | 3.38 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/6 | 17%1/6 | 14% | 7.21 |
| 0:2 | 50%3/6 | 33%2/6 | 10% | 9.81 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Chepelevmatches: 6
Strengths
- Closing out after winning 1st set 3/3Strong
Weaknesses
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 3
- Double faults per match
- 0
- First serve in
- 67%
- Service games held
- 78%
- Return games won
- 56%
Denis Yevseyevmatches: 6
Strengths
- Double faults per match 1 (avg 3.3)Very strong
- First serve in 79% (avg 70%)Very strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 1.7 (avg 2.5)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/3Weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 2/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 1.7
- Double faults per match
- 1
- First serve in
- 79%
- Service games held
- 66%
- Return games won
- 32%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Matches without a deciding set: 6 of 6100%
- Under 21.5 games in 6 of 6 matches100%
- Over 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 6
Win probability
Points won on serve: 59% Points won on serve: 53%Before the match: 80%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.