Kimmer Coppejans — Guy Den Ouden 2:0: match report and statistics

Challenger. Liege · 10.07.2026 14:05 · Finished

Compare teams

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Kimmer Coppejans0%
  • Draw0%
  • Guy Den Ouden0%

Overview

Final score Kimmer Coppejans 2:0 Guy Den Ouden, Challenger. Liege, 10.07.2026 14:05 (UTC). Kimmer Coppejans took the victory.

Form of Kimmer Coppejans in the last 6 matches: wins 5, draws 0, defeats 1. Form of Guy Den Ouden in the last 6 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 3.

More on the site: Kimmer Coppejans statistics, Guy Den Ouden statistics, Challenger. Liege table.

Other games: Tennis matches today. Data on this page is provided by Tennis live score API.

Score by periods

Team12Σ
Kimmer Coppejans
662
Guy Den Ouden
330

Match statistics

  • 0 Aces 2
  • 3 Double faults 2
  • 75% First serve 68%
  • 71% (30/42)1st serve points won(19/39) 49%
  • 36% (5/14)2nd serve points won(8/18) 44%
  • 0% Break points saved 0%
  • 51% (20/39)1st serve return points won(12/42) 29%
  • 56% (10/18)2nd serve return points won(9/14) 64%
  • 0% Break points converted 0%
  • 63% (35/56)Service points won(27/57) 47%
  • 53% (30/57)Return points won(21/56) 38%
  • 58% (65/113)Total points won(48/113) 42%
  • 6 Посл. 10 мячей 4
  • 0 Match Points Saved 2
  • 78% (7/9)Service games won(4/9) 44%
  • 56% (5/9)Return games won(2/9) 22%
  • 67% (12/18)Total games won(6/18) 33%

Game by game

Kimmer Coppejans
Guy Den Ouden
4/5Service games won2/42Breaks12/6Break points converted1/3
  • 1 : 0
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 A:40
  • 2 : 0Lost serve
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP
  • 3 : 0
    15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 A:40
  • 3 : 1
    15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
  • Lost serve3 : 2
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 A:40 40:40 40:A BP
  • 4 : 2Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP40:30 BP
  • 5 : 2
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
  • 5 : 3
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 MP40:30 MP40:40 40:A
  • 6 : 3
    15:0 30:0 40:0 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

Previous matches: Kimmer Coppejans

Previous matches: Guy Den Ouden

Match info

Tournament
Liege
Season
2026

Challenger. Liege

Match forecast and markets

Quick readKimmer Coppejans favourite · 73%Likely score 2:0Expected games 23.8Tiebreak in match 31%
73%Win · Kimmer Coppejans1.36
27%Win · Guy Den Ouden3.77
23.8Expected games
66%Kimmer Coppejans wins 1st set1.51
31%Tiebreak in match3.26
45%Deciding set2.23
  • On serve the model gives Kimmer Coppejans 60% of points and Guy Den Ouden 55% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (44%), then 2:1 (30%).
  • About 23.8 games expected; over 21.5 — 58%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Kimmer Coppejans wins83%5/656%5/973%1.36
Guy Den Ouden wins17%1/644%4/927%3.77
Kimmer Coppejans wins 1st set67%4/644%4/966%1.51
Deciding set17%1/656%5/945%2.23
Tiebreak in match17%1/622%2/931%3.26
Score in sets
2:067%4/622%2/944%2.28
2:117%1/633%3/930%3.38
1:20%0/622%2/915%6.61
0:217%1/622%2/911%8.76

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 9) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Kimmer Coppejansmatches: 6

Strengths

  • Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Aces per match
1
Double faults per match
4.5
First serve in
67%
Service games held
79%
Return games won
53%

Guy Den Oudenmatches: 9

Weaknesses

  • Closing out after winning 1st set 3/5Weak
Aces per match
2.2
Double faults per match
2.3
First serve in
64%
Service games held
70%
Return games won
32%

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • Wins in 5 of 6 matches83%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 5 of 683%
  • Under 22.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
  • Over 19.5 games in 7 of 9 matches78%

Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 9

Win probability

Points won on serve: 62% Points won on serve: 53%Before the match: 88%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.