Giorgio Tabacco — Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 2:0: match report and statistics
Challenger. Cordenons. Qualification · 13.07.2026 09:45 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Giorgio Tabacco0%
- Draw0%
- Samuel Vincent Ruggeri0%
Overview
Final score Giorgio Tabacco 2:0 Samuel Vincent Ruggeri, Challenger. Cordenons. Qualification, 13.07.2026 09:45 (UTC). The win went to Giorgio Tabacco.
Giorgio Tabacco, last 6 games: won 4, drawn 0, lost 2. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri, last 5 games: won 2, drawn 0, lost 3.
Related pages: Giorgio Tabacco statistics, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri statistics, Challenger. Cordenons. Qualification standings and results.
Other games: Tennis matches today. The statistics are powered by SportAPI, a sports data provider.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
 Giorgio Tabacco | 6 | 6 | 2 |
 Samuel Vincent Ruggeri | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 2 Aces 0
- 0 Double faults 6
- 59% First serve 44%
- 73% (16/22)1st serve points won(9/20) 45%
- 47% (7/15)2nd serve points won(6/25) 24%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 55% (11/20)1st serve return points won(11/22) 50%
- 76% (19/25)2nd serve return points won(8/15) 53%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 62% (23/37)Service points won(15/45) 33%
- 67% (30/45)Return points won(14/37) 38%
- 65% (53/82)Total points won(29/82) 35%
- 10 Посл. 10 мячей 0
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 63% (5/8)Service games won(1/8) 13%
- 88% (7/8)Return games won(3/8) 38%
- 75% (12/16)Total games won(4/16) 25%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 0Lost serve0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 A:40 BP
- 3 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 4 : 0Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP
- 5 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 6 : 0Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 MP
Head-to-head
Giorgio TabaccoMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Samuel Vincent RuggeriThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Giorgio Tabacco
Previous matches: Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Match info
- Tournament
- Cordenons
- Season
- 2026
Challenger. Cordenons. Qualification
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Giorgio Tabacco 68% of points and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 61% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (52%), then 2:1 (29%).
- About 24.2 games expected; over 21.5 — 59%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giorgio Tabacco wins | 67%4/6 | 60%6/10 | 81% | 1.23 |
| Samuel Vincent Ruggeri wins | 33%2/6 | 40%4/10 | 19% | 5.31 |
| Giorgio Tabacco wins 1st set | 67%4/6 | 50%5/10 | 72% | 1.38 |
| Deciding set | 33%2/6 | 40%4/10 | 40% | 2.49 |
| Tiebreak in match | 17%1/6 | 20%2/10 | 41% | 2.44 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 33%2/6 | 30%3/10 | 52% | 1.92 |
| 2:1 | 33%2/6 | 30%3/10 | 29% | 3.45 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/6 | 10%1/10 | 11% | 8.99 |
| 0:2 | 33%2/6 | 30%3/10 | 8% | 12.99 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Giorgio Tabaccomatches: 6
Strengths
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
- Aces per match
- 3
- Double faults per match
- 0
- First serve in
- 52%
- Service games held
- 100%
- Return games won
- 18%
Samuel Vincent Ruggerimatches: 10
Strengths
- Aces per match 4.2 (avg 2.8)Strong
Weaknesses
- Double faults per match 5.3 (avg 3.6)Weak
- First serve in 51% (avg 56%)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/4Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/5Weak
- Aces per match
- 4.2
- Double faults per match
- 5.3
- First serve in
- 51%
- Service games held
- 74%
- Return games won
- 21%
What to expect
- Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will hit many aces — 4.2 per match on averageLikely
- Samuel Vincent Ruggeri makes many double faults — 5.3 per matchLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Over 20.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 10
Win probability
Points won on serve: 62% Points won on serve: 47%Before the match: 98%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.