Colin Sinclair — Maxwell Mckennon 2:0: match report and statistics
Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification · 02.08.2026 10:10 · Finished
Head-to-head: Colin Sinclair vs Maxwell MckennonWho will win?
Votes: 0- Colin Sinclair0%
- Draw0%
- Maxwell Mckennon0%
Overview
The Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification match Colin Sinclair – Maxwell Mckennon on 02.08.2026 10:10 (UTC) finished 2:0. The win went to Colin Sinclair.
Form of Colin Sinclair in the last 6 matches: wins 3, defeats 3. Form of Maxwell Mckennon in the last 6 matches: wins 3, defeats 3.
More on the site: Colin Sinclair statistics, Maxwell Mckennon statistics, Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification standings and results.
More matches: all Tennis matches of the day.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
 Colin Sinclair | 6 | 7 | 2 |
 Maxwell Mckennon | 4 | 6 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 16 Aces 4
- 1 Double faults 2
- 74% First serve 60%
- 90% (43/48)1st serve points won(30/43) 70%
- 47% (8/17)2nd serve points won(19/29) 66%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 30% (13/43)1st serve return points won(5/48) 10%
- 34% (10/29)2nd serve return points won(9/17) 53%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 78% (51/65)Service points won(49/72) 68%
- 32% (23/72)Return points won(14/65) 22%
- 54% (74/137)Total points won(63/137) 46%
- 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
- 0 Match Points Saved 1
- 100% (11/11)Service games won(10/11) 91%
- 9% (1/11)Return games won(0/11) 0%
- 55% (12/22)Total games won(10/22) 45%
Game by game
- 0 : 115:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40
- 1 : 115:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 1 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 2 : 215:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 30:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 3 : 30:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 3 : 40:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 4 : 415:0 30:0 40:0
- 4 : 515:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 30:40
- 5 : 515:0 30:0 40:0
- 5 : 60:15 0:30 0:40
- 6 : 615:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 40:30
- Tie-break11 : 91:02:02:12:22:32:42:53:53:64:65:66:66:77:78:78:88:99:910:911:9
Head-to-head
Colin SinclairMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Maxwell MckennonThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Colin Sinclair
Previous matches: Maxwell Mckennon
Match info
- Tournament
- Istanbul 2
- Season
- 2026
- Referee
- Mustafa Gokkaya
Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Colin Sinclair 59% of points and Maxwell Mckennon 57% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (34%), then 2:1 (28%).
- About 24.5 games expected; over 21.5 — 62%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Sinclair wins | 50%3/6 | 43%3/7 | 63% | 1.60 |
| Maxwell Mckennon wins | 50%3/6 | 57%4/7 | 37% | 2.68 |
| Colin Sinclair wins 1st set | 33%2/6 | 43%3/7 | 59% | 1.71 |
| Deciding set | 50%3/6 | 14%1/7 | 49% | 2.06 |
| Tiebreak in match | 50%3/6 | 43%3/7 | 34% | 2.98 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 17%1/6 | 43%3/7 | 34% | 2.92 |
| 2:1 | 33%2/6 | 0%0/7 | 28% | 3.52 |
| 1:2 | 17%1/6 | 14%1/7 | 20% | 4.97 |
| 0:2 | 33%2/6 | 43%3/7 | 17% | 5.81 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 7) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Colin Sinclairmatches: 6
Strengths
- Deciding sets 2/3Strong
- Aces per match
- 4.5
- Double faults per match
- 6
- First serve in
- 58%
- Service games held
- 61%
- Return games won
- 22%
Maxwell Mckennonmatches: 7
Strengths
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Weaknesses
- Tiebreaks 1/3Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.7
- Double faults per match
- 4
- First serve in
- 61%
- Service games held
- 60%
- Return games won
- 21%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Matches without a deciding set: 6 of 786%
- Over 19.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
- Under 21.5 games in 5 of 7 matches71%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 7
Win probability
Points won on serve: 72% Points won on serve: 66%Before the match: 76%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.