Colin Sinclair — Digvijay Pratap Singh 0:2: match report and statistics
Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification · 03.08.2026 10:10 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Colin Sinclair0%
- Draw0%
- Digvijay Pratap Singh0%
Overview
Colin Sinclair vs Digvijay Pratap Singh ended 0:2 on 03.08.2026 10:10 (UTC) in Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification. The win went to Digvijay Pratap Singh.
Colin Sinclair, last 6 games: won 4, drawn 0, lost 2. Digvijay Pratap Singh, last 6 games: won 4, drawn 0, lost 2.
Related pages: Colin Sinclair, Digvijay Pratap Singh, Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification.
See also Tennis matches today. The statistics are powered by SportAPI, a sports data provider.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | 2 |
Match statistics
- 7 Aces 9
- 1 Double faults 0
- 65% First serve 61%
- 73% (37/51)1st serve points won(33/35) 94%
- 59% (16/27)2nd serve points won(16/22) 73%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 6% (2/35)1st serve return points won(14/51) 27%
- 27% (6/22)2nd serve return points won(11/27) 41%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 68% (53/78)Service points won(49/57) 86%
- 14% (8/57)Return points won(25/78) 32%
- 45% (61/135)Total points won(74/135) 55%
- 3 Посл. 10 мячей 7
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 91% (10/11)Service games won(11/11) 100%
- 0% (0/11)Return games won(1/11) 9%
- 45% (10/22)Total games won(12/22) 55%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 1 : 115:0 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 2 : 10:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30
- 2 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 3 : 20:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 3 : 30:15 0:30 0:40
- 4 : 315:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 4 : 40:15 0:30 0:40
- 5 : 40:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 5 : 50:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 6 : 515:0 30:0 40:0
- 6 : 60:15 0:30 15:30 15:40
- Tie-break4 : 71:01:11:21:31:42:42:53:54:54:64:7
Head-to-head
Colin SinclairMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Digvijay Pratap SinghThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Colin Sinclair
Previous matches: Digvijay Pratap Singh
Match info
- Tournament
- Istanbul 2
- Season
- 2026
Upcoming matches: Digvijay Pratap Singh
Challenger. Istanbul 2. Qualification
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Colin Sinclair 64% of points and Digvijay Pratap Singh 66% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (31%), then 1:2 (28%).
- About 25.8 games expected; over 21.5 — 71%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Sinclair wins | 67%4/6 | 33%2/6 | 41% | 2.44 |
| Digvijay Pratap Singh wins | 33%2/6 | 67%4/6 | 59% | 1.70 |
| Colin Sinclair wins 1st set | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 44% | 2.27 |
| Deciding set | 33%2/6 | 50%3/6 | 49% | 2.03 |
| Tiebreak in match | 50%3/6 | 50%3/6 | 50% | 2.00 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 33%2/6 | 17%1/6 | 31% | 3.19 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/6 | 50%3/6 | 28% | 3.62 |
| 2:1 | 33%2/6 | 0%0/6 | 22% | 4.61 |
| 2:0 | 33%2/6 | 33%2/6 | 19% | 5.16 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (6 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Colin Sinclairmatches: 6
Strengths
- Closing out after winning 1st set 3/3Strong
- Aces per match
- 8.3
- Double faults per match
- 4.3
- First serve in
- 63%
- Service games held
- 74%
- Return games won
- 18%
Digvijay Pratap Singhmatches: 6
Strengths
- Deciding sets 3/3Very strong
- Points won on 1st serve 79% (avg 75%)Strong
- Points won on 2nd serve 56% (avg 51%)Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 3/3Strong
Weaknesses
- First serve in 56% (avg 60%)Weak
- Tiebreaks 1/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 7.8
- Double faults per match
- 4.3
- First serve in
- 56%
- Service games held
- 88%
- Return games won
- 17%
What to expect
- Both hold serve confidently — a tiebreak is possible (50% by the model)Likely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
Over 19.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Over 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 6
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.