Matthew William Donald — Giorgio Tabacco 2:1: match report and statistics
Challenger. Augsburg. Qualification · 23.08.2026 13:10 · Finished
Clay
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Matthew William Donald | 4 | 6 | 7 | 2 |
Giorgio Tabacco | 6 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 0 Aces 8
- 9 Double faults 4
- 56% First serve 51%
- 67% (34/51)1st serve points won(34/44) 77%
- 55% (22/40)2nd serve points won(17/42) 40%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 23% (10/44)1st serve return points won(17/51) 33%
- 60% (25/42)2nd serve return points won(18/40) 45%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 62% (56/91)Service points won(51/86) 59%
- 41% (35/86)Return points won(35/91) 38%
- 51% (91/177)Total points won(86/177) 49%
- 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 80% (12/15)Service games won(9/14) 64%
- 36% (5/14)Return games won(3/15) 20%
- 59% (17/29)Total games won(12/29) 41%
Game by game
Matthew William Donald
Giorgio Tabacco
4/6Service games won3/63Breaks23/4Break points converted2/2
- 0 : 10:15 0:30 0:40
- 1 : 115:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 1 : 20:15 0:30 0:40 15:40 30:40 40:40 40:A
- 2 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 A:40 40:40 A:40
- 3 : 2Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- Lost serve3 : 30:15 0:30 0:40 BP
- 4 : 3Lost serve15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP
- 5 : 30:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 5 : 415:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40
- Lost serve5 : 50:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 BP
- 6 : 5Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 A:40 BP
- 7 : 50:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 MP
Head-to-head
Matthew William Donald?LWLWW
Matches played: 1
draws: 0
1 / 1
Wins
0 / 12 / 2
Points
0 / 2
Giorgio Tabacco?LLWWL
Matches
Previous matches: Matthew William Donald
Previous matches: Giorgio Tabacco
Match info
- Tournament
- Augsburg
- Season
- 2026
Match forecast and markets
No data yet
Players' style of play
No data yet
Trends
No data yet
Win probability
Points won on serve: 62%
Points won on serve: 60%Before the match: 58%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.











