Saba Purtseladze — Nikita Ianin 0:2: match report and statistics

World Tennis. Hurghada · 26.08.2026 07:30 · Finished

Compare teams

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Saba Purtseladze0%
  • Draw0%
  • Nikita Ianin0%

Overview

Final score Saba Purtseladze 0:2 Nikita Ianin, World Tennis. Hurghada, 26.08.2026 07:30 (UTC). Nikita Ianin took the victory.

Form of Saba Purtseladze in the last 5 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 2. Form of Nikita Ianin in the last 6 matches: wins 1, draws 0, defeats 5.

Head-to-head meetings: 1. Wins of Saba Purtseladze: 1, wins of Nikita Ianin: 0, draws: 0. The last meeting on 07.08.2025 06:30 ended Purtseladze 2:0 Nikita Ianin.

More on the site: Saba Purtseladze statistics, Nikita Ianin statistics, World Tennis. Hurghada table.

More matches: all Tennis matches of the day. Want the same statistics on your site? Try an embeddable sports statistics widget.

Score by periods

Team12Σ
Saba Purtseladze
430
Nikita Ianin
662

Match statistics

  • 3 Aces 1
  • 6 Double faults 3
  • 61.1% First Serve Percentage 67.1%
  • 30 1st serve points won 34
  • 78.6% Second Serve Percentage 87.5%
  • 13 2nd serve points won 15
  • 3 Break points Played 6
  • 0 Break points converted 2
  • 67 Total points won 78
  • 0 Set Points 3
  • 0 Match Points 2

Game by game

Saba Purtseladze
Nikita Ianin
0/0Service games won0/00Breaks00Break points converted0
  • 0 : 1
    0:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 0:0
  • 1 : 1
    0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40 40:40 Ad:40 0:0
  • 1 : 2
    0:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 30:40 0:0
  • 1 : 3
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 Ad:40 40:40 Ad:40 40:40 40:Ad 0:0
  • 1 : 4
    15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40 0:0
  • 2 : 4
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 Ad:40 40:40 Ad:40 0:0
  • 2 : 5
    15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 40:40 40:Ad 40:40 40:Ad 0:0
  • 3 : 5
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 40:Ad 40:40 Ad:40 0:0
  • 3 : 6
    0:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 :

Head-to-head

Matches played: 1
draws: 0

1 / 1
Wins
0 / 1
2 / 2
Points
0 / 2
Matches

Previous matches: Saba Purtseladze

Previous matches: Nikita Ianin

Match info

Tournament
Hurghada
Season
2026

Upcoming matches: Saba Purtseladze

04.11.2026Match starts
Yuan08:00Purtseladze

World Tennis. Hurghada

Match forecast and markets

MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Saba Purtseladze wins60%6/1080%8/10——
Nikita Ianin wins40%4/1020%2/10——
Saba Purtseladze wins 1st set50%5/1070%7/10——
Deciding set30%3/1020%2/10——
Tiebreak in match30%3/1020%2/10——
Score in sets
2:040%4/1060%6/10——
0:230%3/1020%2/10——
2:120%2/1020%2/10——
1:210%1/100%0/10——

No serve statistics in recent matches — only history is shown.

Players' style of play

Saba Purtseladzematches: 10

Strengths

  • Aces per match 6.7 (avg 4.2)Very strong
  • Points won on 1st serve 72% (avg 68%)Strong
  • Service games held 79% (avg 72%)Strong
  • Return games won 35% (avg 28%)Strong
  • Deciding sets 2/3Strong
  • Closing out after winning 1st set 5/5Strong

Weaknesses

  • Tiebreaks 0/3Very weak
  • Double faults per match 5.8 (avg 4.2)Weak
  • First serve in 57% (avg 60%)Weak
Aces per match
6.7
Double faults per match
5.8
First serve in
57%
Service games held
79%
Return games won
35%

Nikita Ianinmatches: 10

Weaknesses

  • Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/7Weak
  • Closing out after winning 1st set 2/3Weak
Aces per match
3
Double faults per match
4
First serve in
59%

What to expect

  • Saba Purtseladze will hit many aces — 6.7 per match on averageVery likely
  • Saba Purtseladze makes many double faults — 5.8 per matchLikely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • Losses in 8 of 10 matches80%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 8 of 1080%
  • Under 21.5 games in 8 of 10 matches80%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 7 of 1070%
  • Over 21.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%

Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 10

Win probability

Points won on serve: 62% Points won on serve: 62%Before the match: 50%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.