Diane Parry — Ann Li 2:0: match report and statistics
WTA. Monterrey · 28.08.2026 23:05 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Diane Parry0%
- Draw0%
- Ann Li0%
Overview
The WTA. Monterrey match Diane Parry – Ann Li on 28.08.2026 23:05 (UTC) finished 2:0. Diane Parry took the victory.
Form of Diane Parry in the last 6 matches: wins 5, draws 0, defeats 1. Form of Ann Li in the last 6 matches: wins 4, draws 0, defeats 2.
Head-to-head meetings: 2. Wins of Diane Parry: 1, wins of Ann Li: 1, draws: 0. The last meeting on 28.05.2026 14:10 ended Ann Li 0:2 Diane Parry.
Related pages: Diane Parry statistics, Ann Li statistics, WTA. Monterrey table.
More matches: Tennis results and fixtures. Data on this page is provided by Tennis API by SportAPI.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 6 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 7 Aces 7
- 6 Double faults 5
- 53% First serve 60%
- 80% (37/46)1st serve points won(31/51) 61%
- 27% (11/41)2nd serve points won(18/34) 53%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 39% (20/51)1st serve return points won(9/46) 20%
- 47% (16/34)2nd serve return points won(30/41) 73%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 55% (48/87)Service points won(49/85) 58%
- 42% (36/85)Return points won(39/87) 45%
- 49% (84/172)Total points won(88/172) 51%
- 8 Посл. 10 мячей 2
- 0 Match Points Saved 1
- 73% (8/11)Service games won(7/11) 64%
- 36% (4/11)Return games won(3/11) 27%
- 55% (12/22)Total games won(10/22) 45%
Game by game
- Lost serve0 : 115:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 BP
- 0 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 1 : 215:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 2 : 2Lost serve15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
- 3 : 215:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40
- 3 : 315:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- 4 : 315:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40 40:40 40:A BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40
- 4 : 40:15 0:30 0:40 15:40
- 5 : 40:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP40:40 A:40
- 6 : 4Lost serve15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 MP40:30 MP
Head-to-head
Diane ParryMatches played: 2
draws: 0
Ann LiPrevious matches: Diane Parry
Previous matches: Ann Li
Match info
- Tournament
- Monterrey
- Season
- 2026
- Referee
- Martina Baldi
WTA. Monterrey
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Diane Parry 58% of points and Ann Li 61% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (38%), then 1:2 (29%).
- About 24.4 games expected; over 21.5 — 62%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Parry wins | 60%6/10 | 33%2/6 | 33% | 3.06 |
| Ann Li wins | 40%4/10 | 67%4/6 | 67% | 1.49 |
| Diane Parry wins 1st set | 40%4/10 | 33%2/6 | 38% | 2.62 |
| Deciding set | 50%5/10 | 0%0/6 | 47% | 2.12 |
| Tiebreak in match | 40%4/10 | 33%2/6 | 35% | 2.89 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 20%2/10 | 67%4/6 | 38% | 2.62 |
| 1:2 | 20%2/10 | 0%0/6 | 29% | 3.43 |
| 2:1 | 30%3/10 | 0%0/6 | 18% | 5.54 |
| 2:0 | 30%3/10 | 33%2/6 | 15% | 6.84 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Diane Parrymatches: 10
Strengths
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 3/6Strong
- Aces per match
- 4.4
- Double faults per match
- 3.5
- First serve in
- 58%
- Service games held
- 73%
- Return games won
- 30%
Ann Limatches: 6
Strengths
- Points won on 1st serve 74% (avg 69%)Strong
- Return points won 44% (avg 41%)Strong
- Return games won 36% (avg 29%)Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Weaknesses
- First serve in 55% (avg 59%)Weak
- Aces per match
- 3.3
- Double faults per match
- 3.8
- First serve in
- 55%
- Service games held
- 75%
- Return games won
- 36%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
Matches without a deciding set: 6 of 6100%
3 wins in a row100%
Under 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Over 21.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 6
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.