Galloway/King — Milavsky/Shick 2:0: match report and statistics

Challenger. Tiburon. Doubles · 16.09.2026 22:00 · Finished

Compare teams
Hard
Galloway/Kingseed 1
Finished2 : 016.09.2026 22:00
Milavsky/Shick

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Galloway/King0%
  • Draw0%
  • Milavsky/Shick0%

Overview

Final score Galloway/King 2:0 Milavsky/Shick, Challenger. Tiburon. Doubles, 16.09.2026 22:00 (UTC). The win went to Galloway/King.

Galloway/King, last 6 games: won 2, drawn 0, lost 4. Milavsky/Shick, last 6 games: won 4, drawn 0, lost 2.

Statistics and results: Galloway/King, Milavsky/Shick, Challenger. Tiburon. Doubles.

See also Tennis matches today. Scores and statistics come from a live 3D match tracker.

Score by periods

Team12Σ
Galloway/King
662
Milavsky/Shick
440

Match statistics

  • 4 Aces 7
  • 4 Double faults 2
  • 60% First serve 74%
  • 97% (30/31)1st serve points won(29/40) 73%
  • 48% (10/21)2nd serve points won(6/14) 43%
  • 0% Break points saved 0%
  • 28% (11/40)1st serve return points won(1/31) 3%
  • 57% (8/14)2nd serve return points won(11/21) 52%
  • 0% Break points converted 0%
  • 77% (40/52)Service points won(35/54) 65%
  • 35% (19/54)Return points won(12/52) 23%
  • 56% (59/106)Total points won(47/106) 44%
  • 4 Посл. 10 мячей 6
  • 0 Match Points Saved 0
  • 100% (10/10)Service games won(8/10) 80%
  • 20% (2/10)Return games won(0/10) 0%
  • 60% (12/20)Total games won(8/20) 40%

Game by game

Galloway/King
Milavsky/Shick
5/5Service games won4/51Breaks01/3Break points converted0/1
  • 0 : 1
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 BP
  • 1 : 1
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 40:30 40:40 BP
  • 1 : 2
    0:15 0:30 0:40 15:40 30:40
  • 2 : 2
    15:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
  • 3 : 2Lost serve
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 40:40 BP
  • 4 : 2
    15:0 30:0 40:0
  • 4 : 3
    0:15 0:30 0:40
  • 5 : 3
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
  • 5 : 4
    0:15 0:30 0:40
  • 6 : 4
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 40:30 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

The teams have not met yet

Previous matches: Galloway/King

Previous matches: Milavsky/Shick

Match info

Tournament
Tiburon
Season
2026

Challenger. Tiburon. Doubles

Match forecast and markets

Quick readMilavsky/Shick favourite · 60%Likely score 0:2Expected games 27.2Tiebreak in match 68%
40%Win · Galloway/King2.53
60%Win · Milavsky/Shick1.65
27.2Expected games
43%Galloway/King wins 1st set2.33
68%Tiebreak in match1.48
49%Deciding set2.04
  • On serve the model gives Galloway/King 69% of points and Milavsky/Shick 71% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (33%), then 1:2 (28%).
  • About 27.2 games expected; over 21.5 — 79%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Galloway/King wins40%4/100%0/240%2.53
Milavsky/Shick wins60%6/10100%2/260%1.65
Galloway/King wins 1st set50%5/100%0/243%2.33
Deciding set50%5/100%0/249%2.04
Tiebreak in match10%1/1050%1/268%1.48
Score in sets
0:230%3/10100%2/233%3.07
1:230%3/100%0/228%3.58
2:120%2/100%0/221%4.75
2:020%2/100%0/218%5.42

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 2) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Galloway/Kingmatches: 10

Weaknesses

  • Closing out after winning 1st set 3/5Weak
Aces per match
4
Double faults per match
2.8
First serve in
63%
Service games held
83%
Return games won
11%

Milavsky/Shickmatches: 2

No notable deviations from the sample average.

Aces per match
5
Double faults per match
2
First serve in
69%
Service games held
92%
Return games won
8%

What to expect

  • Both hold serve confidently — a tiebreak is possible (68% by the model)Very likely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • Over 18.5 games in 9 of 10 matches90%

Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 2

Win probability

Points won on serve: 70% Points won on serve: 64%Before the match: 79%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.