Ane Mintegi Del Olmo — Ariana Geerlings Martinez 2:0: match report and statistics
WTA. Valencia · 15.09.2026 08:05 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Ane Mintegi Del Olmo0%
- Draw0%
- Ariana Geerlings Martinez0%
Overview
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Ariana Geerlings Martinez ended 2:0 on 15.09.2026 08:05 (UTC) in WTA. Valencia. The win went to Ane Mintegi Del Olmo.
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo, last 6 games: won 2, drawn 0, lost 4. Ariana Geerlings Martinez, last 6 games: won 4, drawn 0, lost 2.
All meetings of Ane Mintegi Del Olmo and Ariana Geerlings Martinez: 1 (wins of Ane Mintegi Del Olmo: 1, wins of Ariana Geerlings Martinez: 0, draws: 0). The last meeting on 10.03.2024 08:00 ended Ariana Geerlings Martinez 0:2 Ane Mintegi Del Olmo.
Statistics and results: Ane Mintegi Del Olmo statistics, Ariana Geerlings Martinez statistics, WTA. Valencia table.
More matches: Tennis results and fixtures. Scores and statistics come from a live 3D match tracker.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
 Ane Mintegi Del Olmo | 6 | 6 | 2 |
 Ariana Geerlings Martinez | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 0 Aces 1
- 7 Double faults 7
- 59% First serve 43%
- 70% (26/37)1st serve points won(10/22) 45%
- 31% (8/26)2nd serve points won(9/29) 31%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 55% (12/22)1st serve return points won(11/37) 30%
- 69% (20/29)2nd serve return points won(18/26) 69%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 54% (36/67)Service points won(19/51) 37%
- 63% (32/51)Return points won(31/67) 46%
- 58% (68/118)Total points won(50/118) 42%
- 6 Посл. 10 мячей 4
- 0 Match Points Saved 4
- 67% (6/9)Service games won(2/8) 25%
- 75% (6/8)Return games won(3/9) 33%
- 71% (12/17)Total games won(5/17) 29%
Game by game
- 0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 1 : 115:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 2 : 1Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- 3 : 10:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30
- 4 : 1Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP
- Lost serve4 : 20:15 0:30 0:40 BP
- 5 : 2Lost serve15:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 BP
- Lost serve5 : 315:0 30:0 40:0 MP40:15 MP40:30 MP40:40 40:A BP
- 5 : 415:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 40:40 A:40 MP40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- 6 : 415:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40 MP
Head-to-head
Ane Mintegi Del OlmoMatches played: 1
draws: 0
Ariana Geerlings MartinezPrevious matches: Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Previous matches: Ariana Geerlings Martinez
Match info
- Tournament
- Valencia
- Season
- 2026
WTA. Valencia
Alicia Herrero Linana
Clara BurelMatch forecast and markets
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ane Mintegi Del Olmo wins | 33%2/6 | 20%2/10 | — | — |
| Ariana Geerlings Martinez wins | 67%4/6 | 80%8/10 | — | — |
| Ane Mintegi Del Olmo wins 1st set | 33%2/6 | 20%2/10 | — | — |
| Deciding set | 0%0/6 | 30%3/10 | — | — |
| Tiebreak in match | 17%1/6 | 20%2/10 | — | — |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 67%4/6 | 70%7/10 | — | — |
| 2:0 | 33%2/6 | 0%0/10 | — | — |
No serve statistics in recent matches — only history is shown.
Players' style of play
Ane Mintegi Del Olmomatches: 6
Strengths
- Double faults per match 3.6 (avg 5)Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 0.2 (avg 0.8)Very weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 0.2
- Double faults per match
- 3.6
- First serve in
- 66%
- Service games held
- 50%
- Return games won
- 40%
Ariana Geerlings Martinezmatches: 10
Strengths
- First serve in 68% (avg 64%)Strong
Weaknesses
- Deciding sets 1/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 0.8
- Double faults per match
- 4.3
- First serve in
- 68%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Matches without a deciding set: 6 of 6100%
- Wins in 8 of 10 matches80%
- Won the 1st set in 8 of 10 matches80%
- Under 21.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
- Matches without a deciding set: 7 of 1070%
- Under 21.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 6, away team — 10
Win probability
Points won on serve: 57% Points won on serve: 48%Before the match: 88%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.