Juan Carlos Prado Angelo — Tsz Fu Wong 2:0: match report and statistics

Davis Cup. Group 2 · 19.09.2026 01:00 · Finished

Compare teams
Juan Carlos Prado AngeloATP: 159
Finished2 : 019.09.2026 01:00
Tsz Fu Wong

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Juan Carlos Prado Angelo0%
  • Draw0%
  • Tsz Fu Wong0%

Overview

Final score Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 2:0 Tsz Fu Wong, Davis Cup. Group 2, 19.09.2026 01:00 (UTC). Juan Carlos Prado Angelo took the victory.

Form of Juan Carlos Prado Angelo in the last 5 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 3. Form of Tsz Fu Wong in the last 6 matches: wins 1, draws 0, defeats 5.

Related pages: Juan Carlos Prado Angelo results and fixtures, Tsz Fu Wong results and fixtures, Davis Cup. Group 2 table.

See also Tennis matches today. Want the same statistics on your site? Try an embeddable sports statistics widget.

Score by periods

Team12Σ
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
662
Tsz Fu Wong
210

Match statistics

  • 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3

Game by game

Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Tsz Fu Wong
2/3Service games won0/44Breaks14/6Break points converted1/1
  • 1 : 0Lost serve
    0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP
  • Lost serve1 : 1
    0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40 BP
  • 2 : 1Lost serve
    15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
  • 3 : 1
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30
  • 4 : 1Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP
  • 5 : 1
    0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 40:40 A:40
  • 6 : 1Lost serve
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 MP40:30 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

The teams have not met yet

Previous matches: Juan Carlos Prado Angelo

Previous matches: Tsz Fu Wong

Match info

Season
2026

Upcoming matches: Juan Carlos Prado Angelo

Match forecast and markets

Quick readJuan Carlos Prado Angelo favourite · 100%Likely score 2:0Expected games 16.8Tiebreak in match 6%
100%Win · Juan Carlos Prado Angelo1.00
0%Win · Tsz Fu Wong—
16.8Expected games
98%Juan Carlos Prado Angelo wins 1st set1.02
6%Tiebreak in match16.66
4%Deciding set22.89
  • On serve the model gives Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 72% of points and Tsz Fu Wong 48% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (96%), then 2:1 (4%).
  • About 16.8 games expected; over 21.5 — 7%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo wins40%2/570%7/10100%1.00
Tsz Fu Wong wins60%3/530%3/100%—
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo wins 1st set40%2/560%6/1098%1.02
Deciding set80%4/520%2/104%22.89
Tiebreak in match20%1/510%1/106%16.66
Score in sets
2:020%1/560%6/1096%1.05
2:120%1/510%1/104%23.41
1:260%3/510%1/100%—
0:20%0/520%2/100%—

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (5 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Juan Carlos Prado Angelomatches: 5

Strengths

  • Points won on 1st serve 64% (avg 58%)Very strong
  • Points won on 2nd serve 50% (avg 45%)Strong
  • Service games held 69% (avg 62%)Strong

Weaknesses

  • Aces per match 0.8 (avg 1.1)Weak
  • Deciding sets 1/4Weak
Aces per match
0.8
Double faults per match
3
First serve in
57%
Service games held
69%
Return games won
24%

Tsz Fu Wongmatches: 10

Weaknesses

  • Aces per match 0.6 (avg 1.1)Weak
  • Double faults per match 4 (avg 3.1)Weak
  • First serve in 50% (avg 55%)Weak
  • Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/6Weak
Aces per match
0.6
Double faults per match
4
First serve in
50%
Service games held
29%
Return games won
3%

What to expect

  • Tsz Fu Wong makes many double faults — 4 per matchLikely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • Matches without a deciding set: 8 of 1080%
  • Deciding set in 4 of 5 matches80%
  • Over 21.5 games in 4 of 5 matches80%
  • Losses in 7 of 10 matches70%
  • Under 21.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%

Based on recent matches: home team — 5, away team — 10

Win probability

Points won on serve: 63% Points won on serve: 51%Before the match: 94%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.