Murphy Cassone — Patrick Zahraj 2:0: match report and statistics
Challenger. Saint-Tropez. Qualification · 21.09.2026 12:00 · Finished
Head-to-head: Murphy Cassone vs Patrick ZahrajWho will win?
Votes: 0- Murphy Cassone0%
- Draw0%
- Patrick Zahraj0%
Overview
Final score Murphy Cassone 2:0 Patrick Zahraj, Challenger. Saint-Tropez. Qualification, 21.09.2026 12:00 (UTC). Murphy Cassone took the victory.
Murphy Cassone, last 5 games: won 4, lost 1. Patrick Zahraj, last 6 games: won 4, lost 2.
All meetings of Murphy Cassone and Patrick Zahraj: 1 (wins of Murphy Cassone: 1, wins of Patrick Zahraj: 0). The last meeting on 02.06.2025 12:30 ended Patrick Zahraj 0:2 Murphy Cassone.
Related pages: Murphy Cassone, Patrick Zahraj, Challenger. Saint-Tropez. Qualification.
Other games: all Tennis matches of the day.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 7 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 8 Aces 8
- 4 Double faults 2
- 57% First serve 72%
- 94% (29/31)1st serve points won(29/42) 69%
- 57% (13/23)2nd serve points won(6/16) 38%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 31% (13/42)1st serve return points won(2/31) 6%
- 63% (10/16)2nd serve return points won(10/23) 43%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 78% (42/54)Service points won(35/58) 60%
- 40% (23/58)Return points won(12/54) 22%
- 58% (65/112)Total points won(47/112) 42%
- 8 Посл. 10 мячей 2
- 0 Match Points Saved 1
- 100% (10/10)Service games won(7/10) 70%
- 30% (3/10)Return games won(0/10) 0%
- 65% (13/20)Total games won(7/20) 35%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 30:0 40:0
- 1 : 10:15 0:30 0:40
- 2 : 115:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30
- 2 : 20:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A
- 3 : 20:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 3 : 30:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 4 : 315:0 30:0 30:15 40:15
- 4 : 40:15 0:30 0:40 15:40
- 5 : 415:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 5 : 50:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 6 : 515:0 30:0 40:0
- 7 : 5Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 MP40:15 MP
Head-to-head
Murphy CassoneMatches played: 1
draws: 0
Patrick ZahrajPrevious matches: Murphy Cassone
Previous matches: Patrick Zahraj
Match info
- Tournament
- Saint-Tropez
- Season
- 2026
Challenger. Saint-Tropez. Qualification
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Murphy Cassone 68% of points and Patrick Zahraj 63% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (43%), then 2:1 (30%).
- About 25.3 games expected; over 21.5 — 67%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy Cassone wins | 63%5/8 | 44%4/9 | 72% | 1.38 |
| Patrick Zahraj wins | 38%3/8 | 56%5/9 | 28% | 3.60 |
| Murphy Cassone wins 1st set | 50%4/8 | 56%5/9 | 65% | 1.53 |
| Deciding set | 50%4/8 | 22%2/9 | 45% | 2.21 |
| Tiebreak in match | 50%4/8 | 22%2/9 | 48% | 2.08 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 38%3/8 | 44%4/9 | 43% | 2.34 |
| 2:1 | 25%2/8 | 0%0/9 | 30% | 3.38 |
| 1:2 | 25%2/8 | 22%2/9 | 16% | 6.36 |
| 0:2 | 13%1/8 | 33%3/9 | 12% | 8.31 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (8 and 9) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Murphy Cassonematches: 8
Strengths
- Double faults per match 2 (avg 3.1)Strong
- Tiebreaks 3/4Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
- Aces per match
- 4.9
- Double faults per match
- 2
- First serve in
- 63%
- Service games held
- 85%
- Return games won
- 22%
Patrick Zahrajmatches: 9
Strengths
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 2.4 (avg 4.6)Weak
- Double faults per match 3.9 (avg 3.1)Weak
- Service games held 75% (avg 81%)Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.4
- Double faults per match
- 3.9
- First serve in
- 65%
- Service games held
- 75%
- Return games won
- 15%
What to expect
- Patrick Zahraj makes many double faults — 3.9 per matchLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
Matches without a deciding set: 7 of 978%
Under 21.5 games in 7 of 9 matches78%
Based on recent matches: home team — 8, away team — 9
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.