Elena Pridankina — Daria Egorova 2:1: match report and statistics
WTA. Ankara · 22.09.2026 08:10 · Finished
Hard
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Elena Pridankina | 7 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
Daria Egorova | 6 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 2 Aces 1
- 13 Double faults 8
- 64% First serve 64%
- 64% (49/76)1st serve points won(39/56) 70%
- 29% (12/42)2nd serve points won(13/31) 42%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 30% (17/56)1st serve return points won(27/76) 36%
- 58% (18/31)2nd serve return points won(30/42) 71%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 52% (61/118)Service points won(52/87) 60%
- 40% (35/87)Return points won(57/118) 48%
- 47% (96/205)Total points won(109/205) 53%
- 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 53% (8/15)Service games won(10/16) 63%
- 38% (6/16)Return games won(7/15) 47%
- 45% (14/31)Total games won(17/31) 55%
Game by game
Elena Pridankina
Daria Egorova
4/6Service games won3/63Breaks23/5Break points converted2/7
- Lost serve0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 40:A BP
- 0 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- Lost serve0 : 30:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP
- 0 : 40:15 0:30 0:40 15:40
- 1 : 415:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 1 : 515:0 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 2 : 515:0 30:0 30:15 40:15
- 3 : 5Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP40:30 BP
- 4 : 515:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30
- 5 : 5Lost serve0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
- 6 : 515:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40 40:40 A:40 40:40 A:40
- 7 : 5Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 MP
Head-to-head
Elena Pridankina?LLWWL
Matches played: 0
draws: 0
0 / 0
Wins
0 / 00 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Daria Egorova?WLWWL
Matches
The teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Elena Pridankina
Previous matches: Daria Egorova
Match info
- Tournament
- Ankara
- Season
- 2026
Match forecast and markets
No data yet
Players' style of play
No data yet
Trends
No data yet
Win probability
Points won on serve: 54%
Points won on serve: 62%Before the match: 17%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.











