Mamedova/Maklakova — Goto/Laskevich 1:2: match report and statistics

World Tennis. Berkeley. Women. Doubles · 25.09.2026 17:10 · Finished

Compare teams
Mamedova/Maklakova
Finished1 : 225.09.2026 17:10
Goto/Laskevich

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Mamedova/Maklakova0%
  • Draw0%
  • Goto/Laskevich0%

Overview

Mamedova/Maklakova vs Goto/Laskevich ended 1:2 on 25.09.2026 17:10 (UTC) in World Tennis. Berkeley. Women. Doubles. Goto/Laskevich took the victory.

Related pages: Mamedova/Maklakova, Goto/Laskevich, World Tennis. Berkeley. Women. Doubles.

More matches: Tennis matches today. Data on this page is provided by Tennis live score API.

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Mamedova/Maklakova
7391
Goto/Laskevich
56112

Match statistics

  • 1 Aces 0
  • 2 Double faults 1
  • 66.2% First Serve Percentage 76.1%
  • 19 1st serve points won 25
  • 90.9% Second Serve Percentage 93.8%
  • 8 2nd serve points won 6
  • 8 Break points Played 8
  • 6 Break points converted 6
  • 63 Total points won 69
  • 0 Set Points 3
  • 0 Match Points 3

Game by game

Mamedova/Maklakova
Goto/Laskevich
5/10Service games won6/104Breaks50Break points converted0
  • 0 : 1
  • 1 : 1
  • Lost serve1 : 2
  • 1 : 3
  • 2 : 3Lost serve
  • 3 : 3
  • Lost serve3 : 4
  • 4 : 4Lost serve
  • 5 : 4Lost serve
  • 6 : 4
  • Lost serve6 : 5
  • 6 : 6
  • 6 : 7
  • Lost serve6 : 8
  • 7 : 8
  • 8 : 8Lost serve
  • 8 : 9
  • 9 : 9
  • Lost serve9 : 10
  • 9 : 11

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

The teams have not met yet

Previous matches: Mamedova/Maklakova

Previous matches: Goto/Laskevich

Match info

Tournament
Berkeley
Season
2026

World Tennis. Berkeley. Women. Doubles

Match forecast and markets

Analysing recent matches…

Players' style of play

Analysing recent matches…

Trends

Analysing recent matches…

Win probability

Points won on serve: 57% Points won on serve: 60%Before the match: 33%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.