Haruka Kaji — Emerson Jones 0:2: match report and statistics
WTA. Jingshan · 28.09.2026 06:45 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Haruka Kaji0%
- Draw0%
- Emerson Jones0%
Overview
The WTA. Jingshan match Haruka Kaji – Emerson Jones on 28.09.2026 06:45 (UTC) finished 0:2. Emerson Jones took the victory.
Form of Haruka Kaji in the last 6 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 4. Form of Emerson Jones in the last 6 matches: wins 1, draws 0, defeats 5.
Statistics and results: Haruka Kaji, Emerson Jones, WTA. Jingshan table.
Other games: Tennis matches today. Want the same statistics on your site? Try SportAPI Match Centre widget.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match statistics
- 0 Aces 2
- 1 Double faults 2
- 66% First serve 76%
- 53% (20/38)1st serve points won(30/45) 67%
- 45% (9/20)2nd serve points won(7/14) 50%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 33% (15/45)1st serve return points won(18/38) 47%
- 50% (7/14)2nd serve return points won(11/20) 55%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 50% (29/58)Service points won(37/59) 63%
- 37% (22/59)Return points won(29/58) 50%
- 44% (51/117)Total points won(66/117) 56%
- 4 Посл. 10 мячей 6
- 1 Match Points Saved 0
- 56% (5/9)Service games won(8/9) 89%
- 11% (1/9)Return games won(4/9) 44%
- 33% (6/18)Total games won(12/18) 67%
Game by game
- 0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 1 : 115:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 2 : 1Lost serve15:0 30:0 40:0 BP
- Lost serve2 : 20:15 0:30 0:40 BP
- 2 : 30:15 0:30 0:40
- 3 : 315:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 A:40
- 3 : 40:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 30:40 40:40 40:A 40:40 A:40 BP40:40 40:A
- 4 : 40:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30
- 4 : 50:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40
- Lost serve4 : 615:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 40:30 40:40 40:A MP40:40 40:A MP
Head-to-head
Haruka KajiMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Emerson JonesThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Haruka Kaji
Previous matches: Emerson Jones
Match info
- Tournament
- Jingshan
- Season
- 2026
WTA. Jingshan
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Haruka Kaji 51% of points and Emerson Jones 53% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (33%), then 1:2 (28%).
- About 24 games expected; over 21.5 — 60%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haruka Kaji wins | 40%4/10 | 83%5/6 | 39% | 2.56 |
| Emerson Jones wins | 60%6/10 | 17%1/6 | 61% | 1.64 |
| Haruka Kaji wins 1st set | 50%5/10 | 83%5/6 | 43% | 2.34 |
| Deciding set | 40%4/10 | 50%3/6 | 49% | 2.04 |
| Tiebreak in match | 30%3/10 | 50%3/6 | 28% | 3.59 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 30%3/10 | 0%0/6 | 33% | 3.05 |
| 1:2 | 30%3/10 | 17%1/6 | 28% | 3.57 |
| 2:1 | 10%1/10 | 33%2/6 | 21% | 4.79 |
| 2:0 | 30%3/10 | 50%3/6 | 18% | 5.49 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Haruka Kajimatches: 10
Strengths
- Double faults per match 2.8 (avg 4.2)Strong
- Tiebreaks 2/3Strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 0.8 (avg 1.3)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/4Weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 3/5Weak
- Aces per match
- 0.8
- Double faults per match
- 2.8
- First serve in
- 63%
- Service games held
- 43%
- Return games won
- 14%
Emerson Jonesmatches: 6
Weaknesses
- Double faults per match 7 (avg 4.2)Very weak
- First serve in 55% (avg 60%)Weak
- Points won on 2nd serve 38% (avg 42%)Weak
- Service games held 45% (avg 55%)Weak
- Tiebreaks 1/3Weak
- Deciding sets 1/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 1.2
- Double faults per match
- 7
- First serve in
- 55%
- Service games held
- 45%
- Return games won
- 41%
What to expect
- Emerson Jones makes many double faults — 7 per matchVery likely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
4 defeats in a row100%
Losses in 5 of 6 matches83%
Over 20.5 games in 5 of 6 matches83%
Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 6
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.