King/Stevens — Arends/Pel 0:2: match report and statistics
ATP. Hangzhou. Doubles · 28.09.2026 05:40 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- King/Stevens0%
- Draw0%
- Arends/Pel0%
Overview
The ATP. Hangzhou. Doubles match King/Stevens – Arends/Pel on 28.09.2026 05:40 (UTC) finished 0:2. Arends/Pel took the victory.
Form of King/Stevens in the last 2 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 0. Form of Arends/Pel in the last 6 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 4.
More on the site: King/Stevens results and fixtures, Arends/Pel results and fixtures, ATP. Hangzhou. Doubles table.
See also Tennis results and fixtures. Data on this page is provided by Tennis API by SportAPI.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
King/Stevens | 3 | 6 | 0 |
Arends/Pel | 6 | 7 | 2 |
Match statistics
- 0 Aces 4
- 1 Double faults 2
- 76% First serve 72%
- 68% (36/53)1st serve points won(36/46) 78%
- 47% (8/17)2nd serve points won(8/18) 44%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 22% (10/46)1st serve return points won(17/53) 32%
- 56% (10/18)2nd serve return points won(9/17) 53%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 63% (44/70)Service points won(44/64) 69%
- 31% (20/64)Return points won(26/70) 37%
- 48% (64/134)Total points won(70/134) 52%
- 4 Посл. 10 мячей 6
- 4 Match Points Saved 0
- 82% (9/11)Service games won(10/10) 100%
- 0% (0/10)Return games won(2/11) 18%
- 43% (9/21)Total games won(12/21) 57%
Game by game
- 0 : 115:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40
- 1 : 115:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 1 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 2 : 215:0 30:0 40:0
- 2 : 30:15 0:30 15:30 15:40
- 3 : 315:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30
- 3 : 40:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 BP
- 4 : 415:0 30:0 40:0 40:15 40:30 40:40 BP
- 4 : 50:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40
- 5 : 50:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- 5 : 60:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 6 : 60:15 0:30 0:40 MP15:40 MP30:40 MP40:40 BP
- Tie-break4 : 70:11:11:22:22:32:43:43:53:64:64:7
Head-to-head
Matches played: 0
draws: 0
The teams have not met yet
Previous matches: King/Stevens
Previous matches: Arends/Pel
Match info
- Tournament
- Hangzhou
- Season
- 2026
ATP. Hangzhou. Doubles
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives King/Stevens 73% of points and Arends/Pel 64% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (58%), then 2:1 (28%).
- About 24.7 games expected; over 21.5 — 63%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| King/Stevens wins | 100%2/2 | 50%5/10 | 85% | 1.17 |
| Arends/Pel wins | 0%0/2 | 50%5/10 | 15% | 6.81 |
| King/Stevens wins 1st set | 100%2/2 | 50%5/10 | 76% | 1.32 |
| Deciding set | 0%0/2 | 70%7/10 | 37% | 2.73 |
| Tiebreak in match | 50%1/2 | 30%3/10 | 53% | 1.89 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 100%2/2 | 20%2/10 | 58% | 1.74 |
| 2:1 | 0%0/2 | 30%3/10 | 28% | 3.60 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/2 | 40%4/10 | 9% | 11.29 |
| 0:2 | 0%0/2 | 10%1/10 | 6% | 17.13 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (2 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
King/Stevensmatches: 2
No notable deviations from the sample average.
- Aces per match
- 1.5
- Double faults per match
- 2
- First serve in
- 64%
- Service games held
- 95%
- Return games won
- 19%
Arends/Pelmatches: 10
Strengths
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 2/5Strong
Weaknesses
- Double faults per match 5.8 (avg 3.7)Very weak
- Tiebreaks 0/4Very weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 3/5Weak
- Aces per match
- 2.6
- Double faults per match
- 5.8
- First serve in
- 64%
- Service games held
- 86%
- Return games won
- 15%
What to expect
- Both hold serve confidently — a tiebreak is possible (53% by the model)Likely
- Arends/Pel makes many double faults — 5.8 per matchVery likely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Over 21.5 games in 8 of 10 matches80%
- Deciding set in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 2, away team — 10
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.