Zachary Svajda — Aleksandar Kovacevic 1:2: match report and statistics

ATP. Tokyo. Qualification · 28.09.2026 03:30 · Finished

HardMarko Savic (Australia)

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Zachary SvajdaZachary Svajda
7241
Aleksandar KovacevicAleksandar Kovacevic
6662

Match statistics

  • 19 Aces 19
  • 5 Double faults 2
  • 66% First serve 58%
  • 78% (49/63)1st serve points won(52/60) 87%
  • 42% (14/33)2nd serve points won(21/43) 49%
  • 0% Break points saved 0%
  • 13% (8/60)1st serve return points won(14/63) 22%
  • 51% (22/43)2nd serve return points won(19/33) 58%
  • 0% Break points converted 0%
  • 66% (63/96)Service points won(73/103) 71%
  • 29% (30/103)Return points won(33/96) 34%
  • 47% (93/199)Total points won(106/199) 53%
  • 4 Посл. 10 мячей 6
  • 0 Match Points Saved 0
  • 80% (12/15)Service games won(15/15) 100%
  • 0% (0/15)Return games won(3/15) 20%
  • 40% (12/30)Total games won(18/30) 60%

Game by game

Zachary Svajda
Aleksandar Kovacevic
4/5Service games won5/50Breaks10/1Break points converted1/3
  • Lost serve0 : 1
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 40:A BP40:40 40:A BP
  • 0 : 2
    0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40
  • 1 : 2
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
  • 1 : 3
    15:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 30:40
  • 2 : 3
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 A:40
  • 2 : 4
    0:15 0:30 0:40
  • 3 : 4
    15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 A:40
  • 3 : 5
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 40:40 40:A 40:40 A:40 BP40:40 40:A
  • 4 : 5
    15:0 30:0 40:0
  • 4 : 6
    0:15 0:30 0:40 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 3
draws: 0

1 / 3
Wins
2 / 3
2 / 6
Points
4 / 6
Matches

Previous matches: Zachary Svajda

Previous matches: Aleksandar Kovacevic

Match info

Tournament
Tokyo
Season
2026
Referee
AustraliaMarko SavicMarko Savic

Match forecast and markets

No data yet

Players' style of play

No data yet

Trends

No data yet

Win probability

Zachary Svajda Points won on serve: 64%Aleksandar Kovacevic Points won on serve: 69%Before the match: 28%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.