Michael Zheng — Yaojie Zeng 2:0: match report and statistics
Challenger. Jingshan · 29.09.2026 06:50 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Michael Zheng0%
- Draw0%
- Yaojie Zeng0%
Overview
Final score Michael Zheng 2:0 Yaojie Zeng, Challenger. Jingshan, 29.09.2026 06:50 (UTC). The win went to Michael Zheng.
Michael Zheng, last 6 games: won 3, drawn 0, lost 3. Yaojie Zeng, last 5 games: won 1, drawn 0, lost 4.
More on the site: Michael Zheng results and fixtures, Yaojie Zeng results and fixtures, Challenger. Jingshan.
Other games: Tennis results and fixtures. Scores and statistics come from SportAPI live match visualisation.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 6 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 2 Aces 8
- 2 Double faults 0
- 66% First serve 62%
- 74% (28/38)1st serve points won(23/34) 68%
- 65% (13/20)2nd serve points won(8/21) 38%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 32% (11/34)1st serve return points won(10/38) 26%
- 62% (13/21)2nd serve return points won(7/20) 35%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 71% (41/58)Service points won(31/55) 56%
- 44% (24/55)Return points won(17/58) 29%
- 58% (65/113)Total points won(48/113) 42%
- 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
- 0 Match Points Saved 2
- 90% (9/10)Service games won(6/9) 67%
- 33% (3/9)Return games won(1/10) 10%
- 63% (12/19)Total games won(7/19) 37%
Game by game
- 1 : 015:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 1 : 115:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 30:40
- 2 : 115:0 30:0 40:0 40:15 40:30
- 3 : 1Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP
- 4 : 10:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30
- 5 : 1Lost serve15:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
- 6 : 115:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 MP40:30 MP40:40 A:40 MP
Head-to-head
Michael ZhengMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Yaojie ZengThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Michael Zheng
Previous matches: Yaojie Zeng
Match info
- Tournament
- Jingshan
- Season
- 2026
Upcoming matches: Michael Zheng
Challenger. Jingshan
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Michael Zheng 68% of points and Yaojie Zeng 63% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (43%), then 2:1 (30%).
- About 25.2 games expected; over 21.5 — 66%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Zheng wins | 60%6/10 | 60%6/10 | 73% | 1.37 |
| Yaojie Zeng wins | 40%4/10 | 40%4/10 | 27% | 3.70 |
| Michael Zheng wins 1st set | 60%6/10 | 60%6/10 | 66% | 1.52 |
| Deciding set | 20%2/10 | 20%2/10 | 45% | 2.22 |
| Tiebreak in match | 30%3/10 | 60%6/10 | 47% | 2.11 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 30%3/10 | 50%5/10 | 43% | 2.30 |
| 2:1 | 10%1/10 | 10%1/10 | 30% | 3.38 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/10 | 10%1/10 | 15% | 6.52 |
| 0:2 | 30%3/10 | 30%3/10 | 12% | 8.59 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Michael Zhengmatches: 10
Strengths
- Return points won 41% (avg 37%)Strong
- Return games won 30% (avg 22%)Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 6/6Strong
Weaknesses
- First serve in 54% (avg 58%)Weak
- Tiebreaks 1/4Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 6
- Double faults per match
- 3.7
- First serve in
- 54%
- Service games held
- 79%
- Return games won
- 30%
Yaojie Zengmatches: 10
Strengths
- First serve in 68% (avg 58%)Very strong
- Double faults per match 2.3 (avg 4)Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Weaknesses
- Tiebreaks 2/6Weak
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/6Weak
- Aces per match
- 6.8
- Double faults per match
- 2.3
- First serve in
- 68%
- Service games held
- 81%
- Return games won
- 10%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
3 defeats in a row100%
Matches without a deciding set: 8 of 1080%
Over 18.5 games in 8 of 10 matches80%
Matches without a deciding set: 8 of 1080%
Over 20.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 10
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.