Cash/Erler — Luz/Matos 2:0: match report and statistics
ATP. Beijing. Doubles · 01.10.2026 03:10 · Finished
HardNikola Svarova (Czech Republic)
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
Cash/Erler | 7 | 7 | 2 |
Luz/Matos | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 1 Aces 2
- 4 Double faults 1
- 73% First serve 67%
- 74% (46/62)1st serve points won(43/57) 75%
- 65% (15/23)2nd serve points won(17/28) 61%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 25% (14/57)1st serve return points won(16/62) 26%
- 39% (11/28)2nd serve return points won(8/23) 35%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 72% (61/85)Service points won(60/85) 71%
- 29% (25/85)Return points won(24/85) 28%
- 51% (86/170)Total points won(84/170) 49%
- 6 Посл. 10 мячей 4
- 0 Match Points Saved 4
- 92% (11/12)Service games won(11/12) 92%
- 8% (1/12)Return games won(1/12) 8%
- 50% (12/24)Total games won(12/24) 50%
Game by game
Cash/Erler
Luz/Matos
5/6Service games won5/61Breaks11/4Break points converted1/5
- 0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 1 : 115:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30
- 1 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 2 : 20:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP40:40 BP
- 2 : 30:15 0:30 0:40
- 3 : 30:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 40:40 BP
- 4 : 3Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP40:30 BP40:40 BP
- 5 : 315:0 30:0 40:0
- 5 : 415:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 30:40 40:40 MP
- Lost serve5 : 515:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP
- 5 : 615:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40
- 6 : 60:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- Tie-break12 : 101:02:03:03:13:23:34:34:44:55:56:56:66:77:78:78:88:99:910:910:1011:1012:10
Head-to-head
Cash/Erler
?LWLWL
Matches played: 0
draws: 0
0 / 0
Wins
0 / 00 / 0
Points
0 / 0Luz/Matos
?WLWWW
Matches
The teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Cash/Erler
Previous matches: Luz/Matos
Match info
- Tournament
- Beijing
- Season
- 2026
- Referee
Nikola Svarova
Match forecast and markets
No data yet
Players' style of play
No data yet
Trends
No data yet
Win probability
Points won on serve: 66% Points won on serve: 67%Before the match: 45%
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.