Barry/Hanatani — Kitahara/Wan 0:2: match report and statistics

World Tennis. Wagga Wagga. Women. Doubles · 01.10.2026 06:30 · Finished

Compare teams
Hard
Barry/Hanataniseed 5
Finished0 : 201.10.2026 06:30
Kitahara/Wan

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Barry/Hanatani0%
  • Draw0%
  • Kitahara/Wan0%

Overview

The World Tennis. Wagga Wagga. Women. Doubles match Barry/Hanatani – Kitahara/Wan on 01.10.2026 06:30 (UTC) finished 0:2. The win went to Kitahara/Wan.

More on the site: Barry/Hanatani results and fixtures, Kitahara/Wan results and fixtures, World Tennis. Wagga Wagga. Women. Doubles.

More matches: Tennis results and fixtures. Scores and statistics come from the SportAPI 3D match tracker.

Score by periods

Team12Σ
Barry/Hanatani
400
Kitahara/Wan
662

Match statistics

  • 0 Aces 0
  • 2 Double faults 3
  • 66.7% First Serve Percentage 65.2%
  • 19 1st serve points won 20
  • 87.5% Second Serve Percentage 81.2%
  • 4 2nd serve points won 10
  • 5 Break points Played 13
  • 1 Break points converted 5
  • 39 Total points won 55
  • 0 Set Points 0
  • 0 Match Points 5

Game by game

Barry/Hanatani
Kitahara/Wan
0/0Service games won0/00Breaks00Break points converted0
  • 0 : 1
    0:15 15:15 15:30 15:40 0:0
  • 0 : 2
    0:15 0:30 0:40 0:0
  • 0 : 3
    0:15 0:30 0:40 15:40 30:40 40:40 0:0
  • 0 : 4
    0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 30:40 0:0
  • 0 : 5
    0:15 0:30 0:40 0:0
  • 0 : 6
    0:15 0:30 0:40 15:40 30:40 40:40 :

Head-to-head

Matches played: 0
draws: 0

0 / 0
Wins
0 / 0
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches

The teams have not met yet

Previous matches: Barry/Hanatani

Previous matches: Kitahara/Wan

Match info

Tournament
Wagga Wagga
Season
2026

World Tennis. Wagga Wagga. Women. Doubles

Match forecast and markets

Analysing recent matches…

Players' style of play

Analysing recent matches…

Trends

Analysing recent matches…

Win probability

Points won on serve: 62% Points won on serve: 62%Before the match: 50%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.