Yibing Wu — Zheng 2:0: match report and statistics
ATP. Shanghai · 07.10.2026 10:05 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Yibing Wu0%
- Draw0%
- Zheng0%
Overview
Yibing Wu vs Zheng ended 2:0 on 07.10.2026 10:05 (UTC) in ATP. Shanghai. Yibing Wu took the victory.
Form of Yibing Wu in the last 6 matches: wins 3, draws 0, defeats 3. Form of Zheng in the last 6 matches: wins 2, draws 0, defeats 4.
Head-to-head meetings: 2. Wins of Yibing Wu: 2, wins of Zheng: 0, draws: 0. The last meeting on 04.07.2025 20:10 ended Yibing Wu 2:0 Zheng.
Statistics and results: Yibing Wu statistics, Zheng statistics, ATP. Shanghai.
Other games: all Tennis matches of the day. Data on this page is provided by Tennis live score API.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 7 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | 0 |
Match statistics
- 5 Aces 6
- 1 Double faults 1
- 54% First serve 54%
- 73% (27/37)1st serve points won(25/38) 66%
- 74% (23/31)2nd serve points won(18/32) 56%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 34% (13/38)1st serve return points won(10/37) 27%
- 44% (14/32)2nd serve return points won(8/31) 26%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 43 Winners 15
- 24 Unforced errors 17
- 93 (14/15)Net points won(7/7) 100
- 72% (50/69)Service points won(43/70) 61%
- 39% (27/70)Return points won(19/69) 28%
- 55% (77/139)Total points won(62/139) 45%
- 5 Посл. 10 мячей 5
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 100% (11/11)Service games won(9/10) 90%
- 10% (1/10)Return games won(0/11) 0%
- 57% (12/21)Total games won(9/21) 43%
Game by game
- 0 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 1 : 10:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 A:40
- 1 : 215:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40
- 2 : 215:0 30:0 40:0 40:15
- 2 : 315:0 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 3 : 315:0 30:0 40:0
- 3 : 40:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 40:40 40:A
- 4 : 415:0 30:0 40:0
- 4 : 515:0 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40 40:40 40:A
- 5 : 50:15 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 5 : 60:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 6 : 615:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30
- Tie-break8 : 60:11:12:13:13:23:33:43:54:55:55:66:67:68:6
Head-to-head
Previous matches: Yibing Wu
Previous matches: Zheng
Match info
- Tournament
- Shanghai
- Season
- 2026
- Referee
- Jimmy Pinoargote
ATP. Shanghai
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Yibing Wu 62% of points and Zheng 62% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (26%), then 2:1 (25%).
- About 25.3 games expected; over 21.5 — 68%.
| Market | Model | Fair odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yibing Wu wins | 60%6/10 | 50%5/10 | 51% | 1.97 |
| Zheng wins | 40%4/10 | 50%5/10 | 49% | 2.03 |
| Yibing Wu wins 1st set | 60%6/10 | 60%6/10 | 51% | 1.98 |
| Deciding set | 10%1/10 | 30%3/10 | 50% | 2.00 |
| Tiebreak in match | 40%4/10 | 60%6/10 | 42% | 2.36 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 2:0 | 30%3/10 | 40%4/10 | 26% | 3.91 |
| 2:1 | 10%1/10 | 0%0/10 | 25% | 3.96 |
| 1:2 | 0%0/10 | 20%2/10 | 25% | 4.05 |
| 0:2 | 30%3/10 | 30%3/10 | 24% | 4.09 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Yibing Wumatches: 10
Strengths
- Tiebreaks 4/4Very strong
- Points won on 2nd serve 55% (avg 49%)Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 6/6Strong
Weaknesses
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/4Weak
- Aces per match
- 4.5
- Double faults per match
- 3
- First serve in
- 59%
- Service games held
- 79%
- Return games won
- 22%
Zhengmatches: 10
Strengths
- Deciding sets 2/3Strong
- Closing out after winning 1st set 4/4Strong
Weaknesses
- Tiebreaks 2/7Weak
- Aces per match
- 5.2
- Double faults per match
- 2.9
- First serve in
- 57%
- Service games held
- 78%
- Return games won
- 26%
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
Matches without a deciding set: 9 of 1090%
Over 20.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Matches without a deciding set: 7 of 1070%
Over 19.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%
Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 10
Win probability
Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.

