Daniel Michalski — Alexander Weis 1:2: match report and statistics

World Tennis. Santa Margherita di Pula · 11.10.2026 08:00 · Finished

Head-to-head: Daniel Michalski vs Alexander Weis

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Daniel Michalski0%
  • Draw0%
  • Alexander Weis0%

Overview

The World Tennis. Santa Margherita di Pula match Daniel Michalski – Alexander Weis on 11.10.2026 08:00 (UTC) finished 1:2. Alexander Weis took the victory.

Daniel Michalski, last 6 games: won 6, lost 0. Alexander Weis, last 6 games: won 4, lost 2.

All meetings of Daniel Michalski and Alexander Weis: 3 (wins of Daniel Michalski: 2, wins of Alexander Weis: 1). The last meeting on 19.11.2022 09:15 ended Daniel Michalski 0:2 Alexander Weis.

Related pages: Daniel Michalski statistics, Alexander Weis statistics, World Tennis. Santa Margherita di Pula.

Other games: all Tennis matches of the day.

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Daniel Michalski
6511
Alexander Weis
1762

Match statistics

  • 2 Посл. 10 мячей 8

Game by game

Daniel Michalski
Alexander Weis
0/3Service games won3/41Breaks31/1Break points converted3/6
  • 1 : 0Lost serve
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
  • Lost serve1 : 1
    0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 A:40 40:40 40:A BP40:40 40:A BP
  • 1 : 2
    0:15 0:30 0:40
  • Lost serve1 : 3
    0:15 0:30 0:40 BP15:40 BP
  • 1 : 4
    0:15 0:30 0:40
  • Lost serve1 : 5
    0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 30:40 BP40:40 40:A BP
  • 1 : 6
    0:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 3
draws: 0

2 / 3
Wins
1 / 3
4 / 6
Points
2 / 6
Matches

Previous matches: Daniel Michalski

Previous matches: Alexander Weis

Match info

Season
2026

World Tennis. Santa Margherita di Pula

Match forecast and markets

Quick readDaniel Michalski favourite · 59%Likely score 2:0Expected games 24.3Tiebreak in match 31%
59%Win · Daniel Michalski1.69
41%Win · Alexander Weis2.46
24.3Expected games
56%Daniel Michalski wins 1st set1.78
31%Tiebreak in match3.20
49%Deciding set2.03
  • On serve the model gives Daniel Michalski 57% of points and Alexander Weis 55% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
  • Most likely score in sets is 2:0 (32%), then 2:1 (28%).
  • About 24.3 games expected; over 21.5 — 62%.
MarkethistoryhistoryModelFair odds
Daniel Michalski wins90%9/1030%3/1059%1.69
Alexander Weis wins10%1/1070%7/1041%2.46
Daniel Michalski wins 1st set90%9/1020%2/1056%1.78
Deciding set10%1/1030%3/1049%2.03
Tiebreak in match30%3/1010%1/1031%3.20
Score in sets
2:080%8/1020%2/1032%3.16
2:110%1/1010%1/1028%3.61
1:20%0/1020%2/1022%4.64
0:210%1/1050%5/1019%5.22

Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (10 and 10) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.

Players' style of play

Daniel Michalskimatches: 10

Strengths

  • Tiebreaks 3/3Very strong
  • Aces per match 1.4 (avg 1)Strong
  • Closing out after winning 1st set 9/9Strong

Weaknesses

  • First serve in 52% (avg 60%)Very weak
Aces per match
1.4
Double faults per match
2.3
First serve in
52%
Service games held
44%
Return games won
22%

Alexander Weismatches: 10

Strengths

  • Double faults per match 1.5 (avg 2.2)Strong
  • Deciding sets 2/3Strong
Aces per match
1
Double faults per match
1.5
First serve in
60%
Service games held
47%
Return games won
17%

What to expect

  • Daniel Michalski will hit many aces — 1.4 per match on averageLikely

Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.

Trends

  • 9 wins in a row100%
  • 4 wins in a row100%
  • Wins in 9 of 10 matches90%
  • Won the 1st set in 9 of 10 matches90%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 9 of 1090%
  • Under 21.5 games in 8 of 10 matches80%
  • Won the 1st set in 8 of 10 matches80%
  • Wins in 7 of 10 matches70%
  • Matches without a deciding set: 7 of 1070%
  • Under 23.5 games in 7 of 10 matches70%

Based on recent matches: home team — 10, away team — 10

Win probability

Points won on serve: 53% Points won on serve: 57%Before the match: 30%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.