Storm Hunter — Sofia Johnson 2:1: match report and statistics
WTA. Memphis. Qualification · 26.07.2026 16:10 · Finished
Compare teamsWho will win?
Votes: 0- Storm Hunter0%
- Draw0%
- Sofia Johnson0%
Overview
Final score Storm Hunter 2:1 Sofia Johnson, WTA. Memphis. Qualification, 26.07.2026 16:10 (UTC). The win went to Storm Hunter.
Storm Hunter, last 6 games: won 3, drawn 0, lost 3. Sofia Johnson, last 6 games: won 2, drawn 0, lost 4.
Related pages: Storm Hunter results and fixtures, Sofia Johnson results and fixtures, WTA. Memphis. Qualification.
More matches: all Tennis matches of the day. The statistics are powered by the SportAPI sports data API.
Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Storm Hunter | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
 Sofia Johnson | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Match statistics
- 1 Aces 5
- 9 Double faults 8
- 62% First serve 59%
- 69% (35/51)1st serve points won(30/55) 55%
- 48% (15/31)2nd serve points won(14/39) 36%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 47% (26/55)1st serve return points won(17/51) 33%
- 64% (25/39)2nd serve return points won(16/31) 52%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 61% (50/82)Service points won(43/94) 46%
- 54% (51/94)Return points won(32/82) 39%
- 57% (101/176)Total points won(75/176) 43%
- 8 Посл. 10 мячей 2
- 0 Match Points Saved 0
- 64% (9/14)Service games won(6/14) 43%
- 57% (8/14)Return games won(5/14) 36%
- 61% (17/28)Total games won(11/28) 39%
Game by game
- 1 : 0Lost serve0:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP
- Lost serve1 : 115:0 15:15 15:30 15:40 BP30:40 BP
- 2 : 1Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 A:40 BP40:40 A:40 BP
- 3 : 10:15 0:30 15:30 30:30 40:30
- 3 : 20:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 30:40 40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- 4 : 215:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
- 4 : 30:15 15:15 15:30 15:40
- 5 : 315:0 30:0 40:0
- 6 : 3Lost serve0:15 15:15 30:15 40:15 MP
Head-to-head
Storm HunterMatches played: 0
draws: 0
Sofia JohnsonThe teams have not met yet
Previous matches: Storm Hunter
Previous matches: Sofia Johnson
Match info
- Tournament
- Memphis
- Season
- 2026
WTA. Memphis. Qualification
Tatiana Prozorova
Storm Hunter
Yexin Ma
Iryna Shymanovich
Christina Lyutova
Match forecast and markets
- On serve the model gives Storm Hunter 56% of points and Sofia Johnson 59% — adjusted for the opponent's return.
- Most likely score in sets is 0:2 (39%), then 1:2 (29%).
- About 24.1 games expected; over 21.5 — 60%.
| Market | history | history | Model | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storm Hunter wins | 44%4/9 | 67%4/6 | 32% | 3.10 |
| Sofia Johnson wins | 56%5/9 | 33%2/6 | 68% | 1.48 |
| Storm Hunter wins 1st set | 44%4/9 | 50%3/6 | 38% | 2.64 |
| Deciding set | 56%5/9 | 33%2/6 | 47% | 2.12 |
| Tiebreak in match | 33%3/9 | 17%1/6 | 31% | 3.18 |
| Score in sets | ||||
| 0:2 | 11%1/9 | 17%1/6 | 39% | 2.60 |
| 1:2 | 44%4/9 | 17%1/6 | 29% | 3.42 |
| 2:1 | 11%1/9 | 17%1/6 | 18% | 5.60 |
| 2:0 | 33%3/9 | 50%3/6 | 14% | 6.95 |
Model: serve and return points of each player in recent matches (9 and 6) → game → set → match. History — share of each player's matches where the market came in.
Players' style of play
Storm Huntermatches: 9
Strengths
- Tiebreaks 4/4Very strong
Weaknesses
- Aces per match 1.8 (avg 2.5)Weak
- Double faults per match 4.6 (avg 3.6)Weak
- Deciding sets 1/5Weak
- Aces per match
- 1.8
- Double faults per match
- 4.6
- First serve in
- 66%
- Service games held
- 64%
- Return games won
- 29%
Sofia Johnsonmatches: 6
Weaknesses
- Comebacks after losing 1st set 0/3Weak
- Closing out after winning 1st set 2/3Weak
- Aces per match
- 0.5
- Double faults per match
- 1.5
- First serve in
- 68%
- Service games held
- 67%
- Return games won
- 41%
What to expect
- Storm Hunter makes many double faults — 4.6 per matchLikely
Compared with the average of all players in these matches (both players and their opponents). Recent 10 matches.
Trends
- Over 19.5 games in 7 of 9 matches78%
Based on recent matches: home team — 9, away team — 6
Win probability
Points won on serve: 61% Points won on serve: 51%Before the match: 92%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.