SportAPI.net

Peter Wright — Ross Smith 6:2: match report and statistics

PDC European Tour · 11.09.2022 17:35 · Finished

Compare teams
Peter Wright
Finished6 : 211.09.2022 17:35
Ross Smith

Who will win?

Votes: 0
  • Peter Wright0%
  • Draw0%
  • Ross Smith0%

Overview

Final score Peter Wright 6:2 Ross Smith, PDC European Tour, 11.09.2022 17:35 (UTC). The win went to Peter Wright.

Peter Wright, last 6 games: won 3, drawn 0, lost 3. Ross Smith, last 6 games: won 5, drawn 0, lost 1.

All meetings of Peter Wright and Ross Smith: 4 (wins of Peter Wright: 0, wins of Ross Smith: 0, draws: 0). The last meeting on 29.10.2025 16:00 ended Ross Smith 5:6 Peter Wright.

Related pages: Peter Wright, Ross Smith, PDC European Tour.

Other games: Darts results and fixtures. The statistics are powered by the SportAPI statistics widget.

Score by periods

Team1Σ
Peter Wright
66
Ross Smith
22

Lead tracker

Peter Wright +4Biggest lead+0 Ross Smith
1

Head-to-head

Matches played: 4
draws: 0

0 / 4
Wins
0 / 4
0 / 0
Points
0 / 0
Matches
29.10.2025Finished
Ross Smith5 : 6Peter Wright
23.10.2025Finished
Ross Smith6 : 2Peter Wright
04.11.2022Finished
Peter Wright6 : 3Ross Smith
30.10.2022Finished
Peter Wright8 : 10Ross Smith
Get this data via API Embed widget

Previous matches: Peter Wright

Previous matches: Ross Smith

Match info

Tournament
PDC European Tour
Season
2022

Upcoming matches: Peter Wright

17.08.2024Match starts
Gerwyn Price08:00Peter Wright

Upcoming matches: Ross Smith

22.09.2024Match starts
Ross Smith17:45Stephen Bunting

PDC European Tour

From round:
Round of 32
Luke Humphries6
Daniel Larsson3
Dave Chisnall6
Bradley Brooks2
Dirk van Duijvenbode3
Daryl Gurney6
Joe Cullen6
Joe Murnan5
Peter Wright6
Raymond van Barneveld3
Jonny Clayton6
Jim Williams4
Damon Heta6
Alan Soutar2
Danny Noppert5
Ross Smith6
Gerwyn Price6
Lewy Williams4
Martin Schindler6
Danny van Trijp3
Nathan Aspinall4
Steve Beaton6
Jose de Sousa6
Dragutin Horvath4
Robert Cross6
Martin Lukeman1
Krzysztof Ratajski6
Geert Nentjes5
Ryan Searle3
Luke Woodhouse6
Dimitri Van den Bergh6
David Evans2
Round of 16
Luke Humphries6
Dave Chisnall3
Daryl Gurney5
Joe Cullen6
Peter Wright6
Jonny Clayton3
Damon Heta3
Ross Smith6
Gerwyn Price6
Martin Schindler1
Steve Beaton3
Jose de Sousa6
Robert Cross5
Krzysztof Ratajski6
Luke Woodhouse5
Dimitri Van den Bergh6
Quarter-final
Luke Humphries5
Joe Cullen6
Peter Wright6
Ross Smith2
Gerwyn Price5
Jose de Sousa6
Krzysztof Ratajski3
Dimitri Van den Bergh6
Semi-final
Joe Cullen4
Peter Wright7
Jose de Sousa3
Dimitri Van den Bergh7
Final
Peter Wright8
Dimitri Van den Bergh6

Trends

  • 3 wins in a row100%
  • Unbeaten in 3 matches100%
  • Both teams scored in 3 matches in a row100%
  • Over 2.5 in 3 matches in a row100%
  • Scored in 3 matches in a row100%
  • Both teams scored in 3 matches in a row100%
  • Over 2.5 in 3 matches in a row100%
  • Scored in 3 matches in a row100%

Based on recent matches: home team — 3, away team — 3

Markets by recent matches

Peter Wrightmatches: 2 · 2Ross Smith
9.0Avg match total10.0
100%2/2Over 7.5—
0%0/2Under 7.5—
100%2/2Over 8.5100%2/2
0%0/2Under 8.50%0/2
0%0/2Over 9.550%1/2
100%2/2Under 9.550%1/2
0%0/2Over 10.550%1/2
100%2/2Under 10.550%1/2
0%0/2Over 11.50%0/2
100%2/2Under 11.5100%2/2
—Over 12.50%0/2
—Under 12.5100%2/2

Share of each team's recent matches where the match total went over / under the line.

Scoring by period

matches: 2 · 2
Peter WrightRoss Smith
ForAg.%Period%ForAg.
126100%Period 1100%65
  • • Peter Wright scores most in Period 1: 12 of 12 goals (100%).
  • • Peter Wright concedes most in Period 1: 6 of 6 conceded.
  • • Ross Smith scores most in Period 1: 6 of 6 goals (100%).
  • • Ross Smith concedes most in Period 1: 5 of 5 conceded.
  • Framed — the period where the team scores / concedes the most. % — share of matches with an event in the period.

Markets in head-to-head

100%Over 1.54 of 4
100%Over 2.54 of 4
100%Over 3.54 of 4
100%Both teams to score4 of 4
50%Peter Wright wins2 of 4
50%Ross Smith wins2 of 4
0%Draw0 of 4

Head-to-head matches: 4 · 11.5 goals per match on average.