Guido Ivan Justo — Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera 2:1: match report and statistics

Challenger. Curitiba · 03.10.2026 15:10 · Finished

Score by periods

Team123Σ
Guido Ivan JustoGuido Ivan Justo
4662
Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraMarcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
6431

Match statistics

  • 1 Aces 1
  • 3 Double faults 4
  • 60% First serve 69%
  • 63% (41/65)1st serve points won(33/60) 55%
  • 40% (17/43)2nd serve points won(13/27) 48%
  • 0% Break points saved 0%
  • 45% (27/60)1st serve return points won(24/65) 37%
  • 52% (14/27)2nd serve return points won(26/43) 60%
  • 0% Break points converted 0%
  • 54% (58/108)Service points won(46/87) 53%
  • 47% (41/87)Return points won(50/108) 46%
  • 51% (99/195)Total points won(96/195) 49%
  • 7 Посл. 10 мячей 3
  • 0 Match Points Saved 0
  • 67% (10/15)Service games won(8/14) 57%
  • 43% (6/14)Return games won(5/15) 33%
  • 55% (16/29)Total games won(13/29) 45%

Game by game

Guido Ivan Justo
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
3/5Service games won1/43Breaks23/6Break points converted2/4
  • 1 : 0
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 40:30 40:40 A:40 40:40 40:A BP40:40 A:40
  • 1 : 1
    0:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
  • 2 : 1
    15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15
  • 3 : 1Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 30:15 30:30 30:40 40:40 A:40 BP40:40 A:40 BP
  • Lost serve3 : 2
    0:15 0:30 0:40 BP
  • 4 : 2Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 30:15 40:15 BP40:30 BP
  • Lost serve4 : 3
    0:15 0:30 0:40 BP15:40 BP
  • 5 : 3Lost serve
    15:0 30:0 40:0 BP40:15 BP
  • 6 : 3
    15:0 15:15 30:15 30:30 40:30 MP

Head-to-head

Matches played: 2
draws: 0

0 / 2
Wins
2 / 2
2 / 6
Points
4 / 6
Matches

Previous matches: Guido Ivan Justo

Previous matches: Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera

Match info

Tournament
Curitiba
Season
2026

Match forecast and markets

No data yet

Players' style of play

No data yet

Trends

No data yet

Win probability

Guido Ivan Justo Points won on serve: 56%Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera Points won on serve: 56%Before the match: 51%

Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.