Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida — Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera 1:2: match report and statistics
Challenger. Curitiba · 02.10.2026 14:20 · Finished
Clay
Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaATP: 270Finished1 : 202.10.2026 14:20
Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraATP: 135 · seed 2Score by periods
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | Σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
Match statistics
- 1 Aces 2
- 3 Double faults 2
- 59% First serve 63%
- 63% (26/41)1st serve points won(34/48) 71%
- 50% (14/28)2nd serve points won(18/28) 64%
- 0% Break points saved 0%
- 29% (14/48)1st serve return points won(15/41) 37%
- 36% (10/28)2nd serve return points won(14/28) 50%
- 0% Break points converted 0%
- 58% (40/69)Service points won(52/76) 68%
- 32% (24/76)Return points won(29/69) 42%
- 44% (64/145)Total points won(81/145) 56%
- 2 Посл. 10 мячей 8
- 1 Match Points Saved 0
- 67% (8/12)Service games won(11/13) 85%
- 15% (2/13)Return games won(4/12) 33%
- 40% (10/25)Total games won(15/25) 60%
Game by game
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
2/4Service games won4/51Breaks21/2Break points converted2/3
- 1 : 0Lost serve15:0 15:15 30:15 40:15 BP
- Lost serve1 : 10:15 0:30 15:30 15:40 BP
- 1 : 20:15 0:30 0:40
- 2 : 215:0 30:0 40:0 40:15 40:30
- 2 : 30:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 30:40
- 3 : 315:0 30:0 40:0
- 3 : 40:15 15:15 15:30 30:30 40:30 BP40:40 40:A 40:40 40:A
- Lost serve3 : 50:15 0:30 0:40 BP15:40 BP
- 3 : 60:15 0:30 0:40 MP15:40 MP
Head-to-head
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida?WWLLL
Matches played: 4
draws: 0
2 / 4
Wins
2 / 45 / 10
Points
5 / 10
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera?WWLWW
Matches
Previous matches: Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Previous matches: Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera
Match info
- Tournament
- Curitiba
- Season
- 2026
Match forecast and markets
No data yet
Players' style of play
No data yet
Trends
No data yet
Win probability
Points won on serve: 59%
Points won on serve: 66%Before the match: 20%Markov model: each player's chance to win a point on serve → game → set → match. Bars below show how much each point mattered.











